Ask
yourself why there is this continual effort by the Beltway insiders and
journalists to elevate foreign policy and national security to the top of the
agenda. Could it be because they believe a “player” in Washington has a better
chance of drawing public and media attention, of gaining recognition, and of
accumulating power when he or she is dealing with matters of war and peace as
opposed to, say, the makeup of the next budget?
After all, we remember the names of the
American presidents—and the men and women who advised them and the journalists
who covered them—who led the nation into war or otherwise operated during those
“interesting times” when “the fate of humanity was hanging in the balance.”
Think of the Cuban Missile Crisis as the
kind of foreign-policy template that officials, lawmakers, and journalists hope
will define their experience in Washington. They fantasize about being “present
at the creation,” of taking part in a great historical event as all the world
waits and watches.
This explains much of what’s wrong with
government. People come to Washington starry-eyed and pumped up on episodes
of The West Wing.
They thirst for greatness when they should be governing with prudence and
wielding federal power cautiously. Far too few are men like the taciturn Calvin
Coolidge who genuinely disliked the spotlight and sought to devolve government’s
powers. Far too many are men like John Kerry, who began his tenure as secretary
of state with a legacy-conscious cannonball-jump into the Israeli-Palestinian
pool, and is now demanding that we Do Something about Syria. Washingtonians
want action, not the banality of restrained governance.
The Syria debate shows the powerful grip
that this mentality has on many lawmakers and pundits. Even with jihadism
creeping into the rebel forces, British Parliament saying no, the American
people overwhelmingly opposed, some in Washington just can’t let this go. Like,
most egregiously, Senator John McCain:
Sen.
John McCain (R-Ariz.) argued Wednesday that President Obama should consider
bombing Syria without congressional approval, because the credibility of the
White House is now on the line.
McCain
said that if Obama acts before any vote in Congress, he could argue that he has
acted in conformity with past administrations, including President Reagan’s
invasion of Grenada in the 1980s.
The White House’s credibility is already
shot to pieces precisely
because it listened to McCain and waded into Syria’s war. But
McCain just can’t let this go; the people’s representatives—and the people
themselves—be damned. Far better to do something grand than to do something
prudent. And best of all, McCain is unlikely to be held accountable for his
omni-martial advocacy.
It’s a great gig, if you can get it.
It’s a great gig, if you can get it.
http://tinyurl.com/mx2zrns
No comments:
Post a Comment