Fund Your Utopia Without Me.™

01 August 2014

The Evil Sentimentality of the Pro-Hamas Left

Hamas, which is an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood
By David French 
Rarely has civilian death been so propagandized by so many of our fellow Americans. Oh, now, I know they’ll protest this characterization. They hate — just hate — the horrific loss of life in Gaza. They hate it so much that they’re moved to wax as eloquently as they can about the horror of death in schools, in mosques, in hospitals — all the places where people are supposed to be “safe,” supposed to seek “refuge.” They can’t stop writing about this death, emoting about this death. And they write and emote until you can almost see the splash of their crocodile tears on your computer screen.
They love peace, you see. They love it so much that they attempt to use every one of their God-given gifts to make you feel what a Palestinian widow feels, to make you stand in the shoes of a man weeping for his lost son. Feel the ultimate anguish. Hear the wailing. Don’t look away from the blood or the rage or the tears.
Have hundreds of thousands of parents and children and aunts and uncles shed similar tears in Syria? Look away from that. No, look away. I mean it. I need your eyes to focus back where they should — on that dead Palestinian child.
Have tens of thousands of jihadist suicide bombers torn women and children limb from limb in a swathe of destruction from North Africa to Pakistan and beyond? Don’t look there. Look at this U.N. school in Gaza. No, not at the rockets in the corner. Don’t look there. Look at the broken body of this school teacher. See the emotional devastation and physical pain of her young, wounded daughter.
Are those smoke trails in the sky that I see? Of rockets aimed at Israeli villages and even Israeli airports, launched amid fervent prayers that they would penetrate Israel’s missile shield and find their own way to an Israeli home or passenger jet? Above all, don’t look there. Or if you do, think of them as gestures of civil disobedience — as small, meaningless acts of rebellion in the face of monstrous injustice.
Yesterday, I took some time to see what people of faith are saying and writing about the war. And as I did, I saw a great deal of advocacy for terrorists — advocacy masked in the language of compassion. This piece, in Patheos, is a perfect representation. Called “Sitting with Pain in Gaza and Israel,” the writer — a poet named Richard Chess — reflects on Mohammed Omer’s New York Times Op-Ed, “Darkness Falls on Gaza,” itself a piece of death-glorifying emotional propaganda.
Here’s Chess: 
I hunger for the stories, the lived experience, the telling details. Enough with the rationales, the justifications, the opinions, the politics-spin-politics-spin. Give me the story of one mother. Give me the story of a daughter, a son. 
Translation: Let me tell you the story I want to tell, the one that is free of the thoughts I don’t want you to think. 
So, now, let’s think about the glories of Islam:
Ramadan: maybe you don’t know much about Ramadan. But how much do you need to know to appreciate values cultivated by its observance? Believe in self-discipline? It takes self-discipline to observe a day-long fast, day after day after day for twenty-nine or thirty days. How about family and community? Observing Ramadan strengthens bonds among family and friends who join together at the end of each day’s fast to share a meal. 

But if our sympathies aren’t aroused by the glories of Islam, well let’s try something else:

If you, dear American reader, cannot relate to Ramadan, maybe your sympathies are aroused by this: the victims of this story have no place to hide, not even places conventionally considered off limits to military attacks: a mosque, a hospital, a school.

And when the reader wants to rebel, wants to point out the reality that Hamas wants civilians to die, we get this:

(Yes, but. Yes, but. I know. I know. I know. They hide _____ there. They live among _____. They this, they that, they the other, which is why we must this, that, and the other, heroically trying to minimize harm to uninvolved people.)

And then there’s the crowning insult:

Now meet the al-Baba family, a family of fifteen. A “corrugated tin roof,” Omer tells us, was all that stood between them and the bombs.” Because other families have been killed in their homes, when a drone is heard overhead, “for safety, [Mr. al-Baba] split [his] family into different rooms—a scene played out in nearly every home in Gaza, a grim shell game of family members.”

I know this story! It’s the story of Jacob, on the eve of his reunion with Esau, dividing his family, herds, and camels into several camps, so that if Esau and the 400 men accompanying him were to attack, Jacob wouldn’t lose everyone and everything dear to him.

The deaths of Palestinians are special deaths, more horrible than Syrian deaths. The Palestinian effort to survive echo the struggles of the Patriarchs. The glory. The heroism. The pain. The injustice.

There is a word for this kind of writing and thinking.


This person is a willing accomplice in a monstrous wrong. Hamas protects its ability to kill Jews by ensuring that many, many Palestinians die and that people like Mr. Chess and Mr. Omer see those deaths, write about those deaths, and put those deaths in front of every American eye. And if not enough Americans are outraged, more Palestinian children must perish. Hamas will continue to kill children as long as that strategy continues to yield rich rewards in western sympathy. Only then will the terror tunnels survive. Only then will the rocket stockpiles persist. Only then will Hamas live to kill as many people as it can as long as it can until the Jews of Israel give up and flee their own land.

I have no patience for this kind of cowardly evil. I will believe the tears when they are shed for all innocents, and I will lend credence to the rage when it is directed at true injustice. Until then, the poets, the journalists, the writers who wallow in Palestinian suffering are nothing more than shills for terrorists as vile as the SS — who lack only the military strength to show the world what they would do to Israel and her people. 

Shame on them. They know exactly what they are doing.


29 July 2014

Is The Left Anti-Semitic? Sadly, It Is Heading That Way

28 July 2014

The Explosion of Anti-Semitism: The Tie That Binds

Just a few reminders of that with which we are dealing:

But, but, but, all they were saying was give peace a chance!





Germany: 'Gas the Jews!'

Turks welcoming back the MV Mavi Marmara flotilla.  Ellerinize sağlık means 'congratulations on your good work.'


seattle 4



All of the above have something in common and it isn't Israel or 'evil, white American/European colonialism.'

From Ace:

Atheist Sam Harris: Here’s Why I Don’t Criticize Israel 

After establishing his secular/atheist credentials, and noting his objection go any state organized around religious identity (though he allows that if it were permissible for any state to be organized around a religious identity, that permitted state would be Israel, given the need for an Escape Hatch for the world’s Jews as proven by just about all of the history of the last several thousand years), he begins explaining why he stands with Israel.  

This is a long piece. I’m just excerpting parts of his best argument. I’m also cutting out a lot of his nuances, because, well, I can’t just excerpt everything.

[T]his gets to the heart of the moral difference between Israel and her enemies. And this is something I discussed in The End of Faith. To see this moral difference, you have to ask what each side would do if they had the power to do it.

What would the Jews do to the Palestinians if they could do anything they wanted? Well, we know the answer to that question, because they can do more or less anything they want. The Israeli army could kill everyone in Gaza tomorrow. So what does that mean? Well, it means that, when they drop a bomb on a beach and kill four Palestinian children, as happened last week, this is almost certainly an accident. They’re not targeting children. They could target as many children as they want….

What would the Palestinians do to the Jews in Israel if the power imbalance were reversed? Well, they have told us what they would do. For some reason, Israel’s critics just don’t want to believe the worst about a group like Hamas, even when it declares the worst of itself.

Consider the moral difference between using human shields and being deterred by them. That is the difference we’re talking about. The Israelis and other Western powers are deterred, however imperfectly, by the Muslim use of human shields in these conflicts, as we should be…  

Now imagine reversing the roles here. Imagine how fatuous–indeed comical it would be–for the Israelis to attempt to use human shields to deter the Palestinians…. Imagine the Israelis holding up their own women and children as human shields. Of course, that would be ridiculous. The Palestinians are trying to kill everyone. Killing women and children is part of the plan. Reversing the roles here produces a grotesque Monty Python skit.  

That’s a very cutting point. Try to imagine it — you can’t. It’s absurd. Not because Israelis wouldn’t use human shields — they wouldn’t, but that’s not the most absurd part.

The absurd part is the idea that Hamas would be in any way deterred by this, rather than thinking, “F***in’ awesome!”

Many didn’t believe Hitler when he said that Jews had to be exterminated either and how’d that work out for the world?  

As I have long said, when someone says that he wants to kill you, BELIEVE HIM.