Fund Your Utopia Without Me.™

08 October 2015

Watch @HillaryClinton Compare The NRA To 'The Iranians And Communists'

'The real answer to this, is for gun owners to form a different organization that supports the Second Amendment, supports their rights to own guns, use guns, go hunting, goes target shooting, but stands against the absolutism of the NRA...You know, the NRA’s position reminds me of negotiating with the Iranians or the Communists.'

- Hillary Clinton, 7 October 2015

Watch @ 28:00:

THIS from the woman who did her college thesis on and corresponded with Saul Alinsky, A LITERAL CARD-CARRYING MEMBER IN GOOD STANDING IN THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. She adored this man who could say hateful, radical garbage like this: 'A racially integrated community is a chronological term timed from the entrance of the first black family to the exit of the last white family...We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races, that for centuries have been oppressed by the whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party … In America, we will aim for subtle victory. Which if one understands Lenin’s Proletariat educated red army it would seem America is now facing the inevitable.' (more)

THIS from the woman whose husband covered up Iran's involvement in the terrorist attack on the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia which killed 20 people and injured 372 more.

THIS from the woman who refused an offer by Moammar Qaddafi's son to enter into peace negotiations preferring to bomb innocent civilians so that she could triumphantly fly into Tripoli on her broom and cackle 'We came. We saw. He died!'

THIS from the woman who began the negotiations with the 'Supreme Leader' of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and then President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  He was, supposedly, the radical one.  When the current president, Hassan Rouhani, was 'elected', he was celebrated as a 'moderate' by the likes of Hillary Clinton even though he had routinely said that he would be perfectly willing to sacrifice the lives of TWENTY MILLION OF HIS OWN COUNTRYMEN if it meant annihilating the State of Israel and DA JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOS!

THIS from the woman who called Syrian President Bashar Assad a 'reformer'.

THIS from the woman who covered-up a terrorist attack in which 4 Americans were murdered and scores were injured and then blamed a video that only about 300 people had seen at the time.  She knew from almost the minute the attack on Benghazi began that it was a terrorist attack (we know this because of emails, memos, testimony, and other information that has been revealed in the ensuing years); yet, she lied to the American people and the entire world by claiming that it was the result of some stupid YouTube video. Then, over the coffins of four, dead Americans, she promised the parents of the fallen to ‘get the guy responsible for this’ by which she meant Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the videomaker, not Ahmed Abu Khattala & Co. Like her statements recently about the Second Amendment, the First Amendment be damned and all for a lie and cover-up.

If anyone is comparable to totalitarians, it's Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Fort Collins' #FeelTheNipple & 'If You Look At My Naked Boobs In Public, You're A Rapist!'


Colorado city weighs allowing women to go topless in public 
FORT COLLINS, Colo. — Officials in this city of 150,000 residents are considering changes to their ordinance on public nudity that would permit women to go topless in public. 
The proposal is in response to requests from residents who say the current ordinance discriminates against women. City law does not prohibit men from appearing in public without shirts. 
At one point in August when the temperature was about 20 DEGREES warmer than Tuesday’s 66-degree high, Brittiany Hoagland, 24, stood on a busy street corner in Fort Collins, about 65 miles north of Denver, wearing a bikini and a placard across her chest: “Illegal to remove.”
For her it’s simple: Colorado’s Constitution prohibits denying equal rights on account of sex. If men may go bare chested in public legally, so should women.

This reminds me of a Twitter convo that I had last night with George Eliseo… 

George Eliseo ‏@GeorgeEliseo 
Feminists Call The Cops When I Show Up. Here’s Why. via @BreitbartNews 

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews U’ve really got to stop staring at the braided, beaded, non-deodourised, purple-dyed armpit hair of FemiNazis. 

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews You’ll drive the Neo-Victorian Feminists to their fainting couches in their safe spaces to cuddle w/their…1 

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews…’comfort animals or plush toys’ whilst screaming about patriarchy & the ‘violence’ you inflicted on them… 2

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews…to their Diversity & Tolerance Deans and trauma counsellors and demand that a Star Chamber convene to… 3

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews…send you to Rm 101 for castration for committing a thoughtcrime & the failure to issue… 4 

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews…a trigger warning. Afterall, they have the ‘right’ to parade their fugly axilla folicles…5

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @BreitbartNews…and you don’t have any ‘right’ whatsoever to look at them! 

George Eliseo ‏@GeorgeEliseo 
@SophieRo3 Ha I wish I were that cool, unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately) the article’s by @nero @BreitbartNews

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo Well, in that case, @Nero had better watch his step or ‘one way or another they're gonna find ya. They’re gonna getcha getcha getcha getcha.’

George Eliseo ‏@GeorgeEliseo 
@SophieRo3 Blondie rocks! @Nero 

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3 
@GeorgeEliseo @Nero Yes, she does. I was listening to that song earlier today as I wrote a post. Had to go with Goodbye Earl instead. 

'Earl, ain't it dark, wrapped up in that tarp?'

Sophie Ro ‏@SophieRo3
@GeorgeEliseo @Nero If you read this, you can probably understand why...
Who says Lorena Bobbitts can't strike twice?

And, sure ’nuff, the day after Fort Collins votes to allow women to parade around topless in public, women will start screaming that men are ogling them for good, bad, and repulsive reasons. Then, they will start protesting about how #FreeBreastsMatter and anyone who disagrees with them is just a cog in the patriarchal wheel attempting to 'continue oppressing them'. 

They will argue that when someone looks at their breasts without a ‘Yes Means Yes’ contract – whether they are a male, female, child, tranny, eir, zirself, etc – they are committing an ‘act of violence’ and should be prosecuted because this #RapeCulture MUST end!

Before long, the nutters will be demanding a new tax increase to pay for universal, government-controlled blinders so that everyone can only look at that which is permitted by Big Brother.

07 October 2015

Arguing With A GunGrabber: Guns v Scissors, Frosted Flakes v 'Karaoke Bars'

If you nuts want to mock the brainy beautiful Mika, then I’ll mock you. Here is a philosophical question. Who’s game? I read a news piece about two grown men both were flatmates. They lived surrounded by guns. Guns on the kitchen table guns under their pillows, guns in the head, let’s just say guns everywhere. One night one of the flatmates got hungry and ate the last bowl of Frosted Flakes. The other flatmate took a gun on the table and blew away his friend, because he was saving that bowl for morning. Now, was the gun the problem or was it a Frosted Flakes problem? 

- OliverB on October 6, 2015 at 6:33 PM 

It's the Liberty versus Control's version of rock, paper, scissors! 

OK, so like there was this woman named Zhang. One day, she got all paranoid and hissy and started to think that her man was foolin’ around with some sweet, young thang down at the local ‘karaoke bar’ (Insider tip: in China, a ‘karaoke bar’ is slang for brothel). So, she crushed up some sleeping pills and put them in Han Mou’s drink. After he passed out, she proceeded to cut off his penis with a pair of scissors. For good measure, she flushed the member down the loo to ensure that there would be no reconnection, so to speak. 

Fast forward three months, an apology, a release on bail, and reconciliation. Han decided that, even though he still loved his wife, he was, once again, determined to get a divorce because Psychang was ‘just too jealous’. ‘While awaiting Zhang’s trial, the pair still lived together with their children. But, fearing that his wife might go to prison, Han Mou went out to look for a new partner, someone to be a mother to his children if their biological mother ended up behind bars.’ (Dude, I’ve been really feeling your pain up until now, but I must admit that it is just a tad selfish to seek out a replacement wife for the sole purpose of caring for your spawn. 我選擇了你,你選擇了我,這是我們的選擇。我會愛你直到海枯和岩石崩。/ I chose you, you chose me, and this is our choice. I’ll love you until the seas run dry and the rocks crumble.’

One day, out of the blue, Zhang just flipped out over something about Han’s trousers…or so she claimed. Obviously, her psychosis, jealousy, husband’s rejection, pending divorce, looming prison sentence, and the prospect of another woman bagging his tea and I’m not talking about preparing Han’s afternoon Xinyang Fur Tip green tea, IYKWIMAITTYD, had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with it./ 

So, Mrs Zhang Thang obtained a syringe and used it to inject crushed sleeping pills into a container of milk from which she knew her husband would drink. Sure enough, he drank it and soon, sure 'nuff, Qiáozhì Foreman was out for the count whilst Zhang Ali was floating like a butterfly as she proceeded to retrieve her trusty pair of scissors. After which, she returned to the scene of the crime because...why not? Since she could not remove the penis because it was, by then, floating somewhere in the South China Sea, she could hack away at her man’s remaining testicles, which she gleefully did while probably singing 'Earl, ain't it dark, wrapped up in that tarp?' or some Chinese version thereof. 

I doubt that there has been reconciliation, but I can reasonably predict that Han Mou is now known as Han Solo

Now, was Han Mou the problem? 

Or were the ‘karaoke bars’ the problem? 

Or was Han’s drink the problem? 

Or were the sleeping pills the problem? 

Or was Han’s penis the problem? 

Or were the scissors the problem? 

Or was the toilet the problem? 

Or were Han’s trousers the problem? 

Or was the syringe the problem? 

Or was the milk the problem? 

Or were Han’s testicles the problem? 


It’s really not a difficult question to answer, good ol’ Ollie.

Oh!!! A test I can pass! I choose “Was the fact than Zhang was a nutter the problem?” for $1000 Alex! :) 

- smokeyblonde on October 6, 2015 at 10:56 PM 

If Zhang of Anhui had been your typical terrorist, Zayda of Benghazi, ‘out for a walk one night and decided [she'd] go kill some Americans’, the answer would be: 

‘Was the fact that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula made a video, Innocence of Muslims, which only about 300 people worldwide had seen, the problem?’ for $1,000, Alex!'


Ollie, Charles CW Cooke has a few words for you.  Here's an excerpt:

An Open Rant Aimed at Those Who Would Repeal the Second Amendment 

Talk is cheap, but persuading Americans to surrender their rights will be expensive, difficult, and time-consuming… 
When the likes of Rob Delaney and Bill Maher and Keith Ellison say that we need to get rid of the Second Amendment, they are not speaking in a vacuum but reflecting the views of a small but vocal portion of the American population. 
And they mean it. 
That being so, here’s the million-dollar question: What the hell are they waiting for? Go on, chaps. Bloody well do it. 
Seriously, try it. Start the process. Stop whining about it on Twitter, and on HBO, and at the Daily Kos. Stop playing with some Thomas Jefferson quote you found on Google. Stop jumping on the news cycle and watching the retweets and viral shares rack up. Go out there and begin the movement in earnest. Don’t fall back on excuses. Don’t play cheap motte-and-bailey games. And don’t pretend that you’re okay with the Second Amendment in theory, but you’re just appalled by the Heller decision. You’re not. Heller recognized what was obvious to the amendment’s drafters, to the people who debated it, and to the jurists of their era and beyond: That “right of the people” means “right of the people,” as it does everywhere else in both the Bill of Rights and in the common law that preceded it. A Second Amendment without the supposedly pernicious Heller “interpretation” wouldn’t be any impediment to regulation at all. It would be a dead letter. It would be an effective repeal. It would be the end of the right itself. In other words, it would be exactly what you want! Man up. Put together a plan, and take those words out of the Constitution. 
It’ll be tough explaining to suburban families that their established conception of American liberty is wrong. You might even suffer at the polls because of it. But that’s what it’s going to take. This will involve hard work, of course. You can’t just sit online and preen to those who already agree with you. No siree. Instead, you’ll have to go around the states — traveling and preaching until the soles of your shoes are thin as paper. You’ll have to lobby Congress, over and over and over again. You’ll have to make ads and shake hands and twist arms and cut deals and suffer all the slings and arrows that will be thrown in your direction. You’ll have to tell anybody who will listen to you that they need to support you; that if they disagree, they’re childish and beholden to the “gun lobby”; that they don’t care enough about children; that their reverence for the Founders is mistaken; that they have blood on their goddamn hands; that they want to own firearms only because their penises are small and they’re not “real men.” And remember, you can’t half-a$s it this time. You’re not going out there to tell these people that you want “reform” or that “enough is enough.” You’re going there to solicit their support for removing one of the articles within the Bill of Rights. 
Make no mistake: It’ll be unpleasant strolling into Pittsburgh or Youngstown or Pueblo and telling blue-collar Democrat after blue-collar Democrat that he only has his guns because he’s not as well endowed as he’d like to be. It’ll be tough explaining to suburban families that their established conception of American liberty is wrong. You might even suffer at the polls because of it. But that’s what it’s going to take. So do it. Start now. Off you go.