The Justice Department’s involvement in the Zimmerman case is highly suspect.
Judicial Watch, a conservative legal
foundation, has used the Freedom of Information Act to uncover documents
that show Eric Holder’s Justice Department used a “community relations”
unit to support and stage-manage public protests in Florida against
George Zimmerman after his controversial February 2012 shooting of
Trayvon Martin.
Justice’s Community Relations Service (CRS) even
helped organize a meeting between Sanford, Fla., public officials and
the local NAACP. The result was the resignation of police chief Bill Lee
over his handling of the Martin case. While his resignation was
rescinded after a few weeks by local officials, Chief Lee faced further
pressure to leave his job and ultimately quit for good two months later.
Valerie Houston, one of the pastors leading the protests against
Zimmerman and Lee, praised the Community Relations Service as being
“there for us.”
The website for the CRS claims it “does not take
sides among disputing parties” and only provides “impartial conciliation
and mediation services.” But the evidence of its activities in Sanford
shows that it placed a large thumb on the scales of justice in the
Zimmerman case. What can providing support for a “March for Trayvon
Martin” rally headlined by the rabble-rousing Reverend Al Sharpton have
to do with “conciliation and mediation”?
From
top to bottom, the handling of the Zimmerman case was marinated in
racial political correctness. Lee, the former Sanford police chief, told
CNN this week that he faced severe pressure from outside forces to
conduct his investigation in an unprofessional way so as to placate the
public. “It was [relayed] to me that they just wanted an arrest. They
didn’t care if it got dismissed later,” he said. “You don’t do that.”
Lee told CNN that arresting Zimmerman based on the evidence he had
collected would have violated Zimmerman’s Fourth Amendment rights. But
he said political influence “forced a change in the course of the normal
criminal-justice process. . . . That investigation was taken away from
us. We weren’t able to complete it.”
It looks as if the trial of George Zimmerman on second-degree-murder
charges will go to the jury today, but regardless of the verdict, the
Justice Department has some questions to answer about its role in the
pressure campaign leading up to his indictment. “My guess is that most
Americans would rightly object to taxpayers paying government employees
to help organize racially charged demonstrations,” says Tom Fitton, the
president of Judicial Watch, in a statement on the group’s website.
Sadly,
I am not surprised that Eric Holder’s Justice Department engaged in
suspect activity in the Trayvon Martin case. Barack Obama frequently
touted his experience as a “community organizer” during his 2008
campaign. The media gave him almost a complete pass on the more
controversial parts of his record, especially his role as a top trainer
and lawyer for the infamous Saul Alinsky–inspired group ACORN, which by
2008 had had many of its employees convicted of voter fraud. After
Obama’s election, the Justice Department dropped any pending
investigations of ACORN. Congress finally revoked the group’s federal
funding in 2010 after filmmaker James O’Keefe’s hidden cameras caught
its employees giving advice on how to conceal money gained from a
fictional teenage prostitution ring. It soon declared bankruptcy, and
some of its affiliates continued operations under new mismanagement.
I
wondered back in 2008 how the federal government’s focus would change
with a left-wing “community organizer” installed as president. We now
have a partial answer. It appears that some of the tactics and
approaches ACORN used have been moved into the Justice Department and
other federal agencies. In the old days, when individual appropriations
bills for federal agencies were still passed by Congress, it was
possible to defund groups like ACORN. But now, with congressional
gridlock ensuring that federal agencies are financed by dubious annual
spending resolutions that simply continue existing program funding, any
effective oversight by Congress is a dead letter. The question now isn’t
really how many other left-wing “community organizing” projects like
the one at Justice are being subsidized by the Obama administration. The
real issue is whether the entire Obama administration has basically
become an enabler and cheerleader for every Saul Alinsky tactic its
radical appointees want to embrace — from the Department of Housing and
Urban Development’s bullying local officials over public-housing
construction demands to the Environmental Protection Agency’s colluding
with environmentalist groups to lose lawsuits the groups file against
the EPA in court.
http://tinyurl.com/meglem3
No comments:
Post a Comment