Jeralyn Merritt operates a blog called 'TalkLeft.' As its name indicates, it approaches issues from the left-sided viewpoint and I am certain that the two of us would disagree on most things. Ms Merritt, however, has a terrific analysis of the Zimmerman trial, which I encourage you to read in full. Here's some of it:
'Now that the evidence has been presented, my previously expressed opinions on this case have only become more solidified. Looking to the future, and the legacy of this case, here is what I see. Keep in mind this is only my opinion.
Whether George Zimmerman is acquitted or convicted, and I am not making any predictions before hearing closing arguments and reading the jury instructions, the legacy of this case will be that the media never gets it right, and worse, that a group of lawyers, with the aid of a public relations team, who had a financial stake in the outcome of pending and anticipated civil litigation, were allowed to commandeer control of Florida’s criminal justice system, in pursuit of a divisive, personal agenda.
Their transformation of a tragic but spontaneous shooting into the crime of the century, and their relentless demonization of the person they deemed responsible, not for a tragic killing, but for “cold-blooded murder,” has called into question the political motives and ethics of the officials serving in the Executive branch of Florida’s government, ruined the career of other public officials, turned the lives of the Zimmerman family, who are as innocent as their grieving clients, into a nightmare, and along the way, set back any chance of a rational discussion of the very cause they were promoting, probably for years.
The problems of racial disparity and arbitrary enforcement of our criminal laws are real, systemic and need to be addressed. Criminal defense lawyers see it and fight to correct it every day. From charging decisions to plea offers to sentences, the system is not fair and everybody knows it.
But this case has never been representative of those problems. And perhaps most unfortunate of all, as a result of the false narrative created by the lawyers for grieving parents who tragically lost their son — a narrative perpetuated by a complicit and ratings-hungry media — any attempt at meaningful reform is likely to fall on deaf ears for years to come.
The state's theory hasn't changed from day 1. We can all recite it by heart: Zimmerman improperly profiled Martin as a criminal and pursued him, making Zimmerman the one who initiated the confrontation. The state can argue that it amounts to ill-will, hatred and spite, but it doesn't defeat Zimmerman's self-defense claim. If the jury finds Zimmerman acted in self-defense, his actions were justified and lawful, and he's not guilty of either murder 2 or manslaughter.
It's a thin reed the state is hanging on by.'
Related: Focusing On All The Wrong Things In The Zimmerman Trial