By Michael Walsh
Bleat
of the day comes from the Hill:
Supporters
and critics of President Obama are looking for leadership on many pressing
issues from the White House, but many believe they are not getting it.
On
Monday, Obama held a Cabinet meeting and spoke about his effort to modernize
government databases.
He
avoided public remarks on several matters seen as more pressing, such as
turmoil in Egypt and the wider Middle East, faltering efforts to reform
immigration in the U.S. and the rocky implementation of ObamaCare. Instead the
president spoke to a small group of reporters about his efforts to improve
databases and make government more efficient.
“We’re
working to make huge swaths of your government more transparent and more
accountable than ever before,” Obama said at the White House.
Even
to the most loyal Obama supporters, the move seemed irrelevant, even odd.
’Tis
a puzzlement, as the King of Siam said to Anna, although on closer inspection,
perhaps not really. When the presidency is an entry-level position for a man
with a resume as thin as Barack Obama’s, “leadership” in the conventional
sense is just about the last thing you’d expect from him. Comparisons to
Chance the Gardener from Being There have been made since the
beginning of the Obama presidency, and one can easily imagine him saying
something like, “As long as the roots are not severed, all is well. And
all will be well in the garden.” To which the media nods it head and replies,
“Hmm.” In fact, it pretty much happens on a daily basis.
But
here we are. In an unknown Illinois state senator, an emissary from the Daley
Machine in Chicago, liberals — okay, David Axelrod — saw in Obama (as he
himself noted in one of his autobiographies) what they wanted to see, and that
was the second coming of Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and LBJ, plus “social justice”
payback. I take Charles Kesler’s point in his astute analysis of the Obama
phenomenon, I Am the Change, that presidental
“leadership” is largely a concept created by the Progressives to effect change
faster than the slowpoke Constitution otherwise would have allowed, and is not
necessarily to be cheered:
Wilson
was the first to celebrated “leadership” as an essential part of American
democracy. Alongside the living constitution, leadership was the second element
he contributed to the political definition of America’s new liberalism. It’s
had a booming career.
Obama’s
notion of “leadership,” though, is nothing like Wilson’s or Roosevelt’s or
Johnson’s. In one sense, it’s less dangerous, in that he simply lacks the tools
to force Congress to his will. (The successful passage of Obamacare was due not
to him but to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.) In another, however, it’s
more dangerous since, in a reverse of Reagan, Obama speaks directly to the
media over the heads of Congress and the American people, and is thus protected
and served by the alternative view of reality they dish out daily to their
readers and viewers. And in this world, Obama is the perpetual outsider,
heroically running against the very change he is supposed to represent, an
eternal candidate for a future office yet unthought of. With no previous
executive or leadership experience, he dances with what brung him to the
pinnacle of political power: his ability to stand before an audience and
make them feel good about themselves. Presidential historian Michael Beschloss
famously burbled that Obama was “probably the smartest guy ever to become
president.” But that assessment says more about Beschloss than it does Obama.
The
bleat goes on:
Republicans
said the administration appeared rudderless, while Democrats said Obama needed
to be more proactive instead of reactive.
“If
I were to guess, I would venture to say that some people would like to see him
speak up on these issues a little more than he’s doing,” said a former administration
official. “I think some people want to see more, not less, of him.”
Tony
Fratto, who served as White House deputy press secretary under former President
George W. Bush, defended the Obama administration’s approach in handling the
database announcement.
Fratto
said any administration bears the responsibility of running the government.
“It’s the world’s
biggest operation and things like databases and technology are huge and
confounding,” Fratto said.
Still, he
acknowledged: “In this environment, it does feel like a non-sequitur with
what’s going on in this world.”
But
that’s reality in the post-presidential presidency. Fast and Furious, Benghazi,
the IRS, the NSA, the Foggy Bottom mess, Egypt, and the looming disaster of
Obamacare are yesterday’s news. Today, we’re talking about modernizing
government databases...
Wait
a minute — what?
http://tinyurl.com/lnmrmch
No comments:
Post a Comment