Even Scandinavians want to cut back on benefits to encourage growth.
By Michael Tanner
If
Congress — once it reopens the government and gets back to its usual
business of redistributing taxpayers’ money — has any interest in
reforming our burgeoning welfare state, they might look, of all places,
to Europe, where serious reforms are underway.
Leading the way is
Great Britain. While in the United States the federal government funds
126 separate anti-poverty programs, 72 of which provide cash or in-kind
benefits to individuals, Britain is consolidating its six major welfare
programs (the jobseeker’s allowance, the income-support allowance, the
employment-support allowance, the child tax credit, the working tax
credit, and housing benefits) into a single grant.
While someone
receiving the seven most common U.S. benefits (Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families, Medicaid, food stamps, WIC, housing assistance,
utilities assistance, and free commodities) rakes in
more than $35,600 in benefits in the ten most generous states, Britain
has now capped the new consolidated grant at no more than £500 per week
(about $40,000 a year) for a family, and just £350 (about $29,000 a
year) for single individuals. It is estimated that as many as 40,000
households — about 1.6 percent of those receiving benefits — will have
their total benefits reduced as a result of the benefit cap.
The
idea, according to welfare secretary Ian Duncan Smith, is that “benefits
should be a safety net — but not something that gives claimants an
income out of reach of many hard-working families.”
At the same
time, by moving away from a patchwork of different programs to a single
universal credit, Britain will shift welfare payments to put a greater
emphasis on children. It is estimated that the consolidation means some
2.8 million British households, mostly couples without children, will
eventually receive lower benefits (although current recipients are being
held harmless during the transition), while some 3.1 million households
will actually get more money.
Moreover, the benefits will now be
paid in a monthly lump sum, rather than weekly or biweekly, and paid
directly to the recipient rather than to intermediaries like landlords.
The poor will be treated like adults, with responsibility for their own
finances, rather than childlike wards of the state.
And there will
be a greater overall emphasis on moving recipients from welfare to
work. “We want to help people find a job and move away from benefits,”
Duncan Smith explained.
Meanwhile in the Netherlands, King
Willem-Alexander’s speech to parliament in September, written for him by
the government of Prime Minister Mark Rutte, warned that “the classic
welfare state of the second half of the 20th century . . . brought forth
arrangements that are unsustainable in their current form.”
The
Rutte government plans to reform the welfare state with the
understanding that “people must take responsibility for their own future
and create their own social and financial safety nets, with less help
from the national government.”
Even the so-called “Nordic model,”
long touted by advocates of the welfare state, is undergoing profound
changes. Sweden long ago enacted significant reforms to its safety net,
including the partial privatization of its social-security system. This
August, Finland announced plans to increase the effective retirement
age, cut payments to students, and reform maternity leave. And in
Denmark, the government has said that the time has come to embrace the
“modernization of the welfare state,” adding that the system “needs to
prioritize things in a new way and create the best possible conditions
for people to get a job.” In fact, the Danish government has already
slashed the length of unemployment benefits from four years to just two.
Perhaps
the last holdout, Norway, long buoyed by oil revenue, elected a new
center-right government this fall on a platform that called for, among
other things, cutting taxes, reducing bureaucracy, and reforming the
welfare system to better encourage entrepreneurship. The new government
has plenty of public support for its plans: A recent survey by Fafo, a
Norwegian research foundation, reported 51 percent of Norwegians
supported reducing welfare benefits in order to secure economic growth.
While
the government shutdown is ostensibly about Obamacare and debt, the
real underlying question is the future of U.S. government spending,
which is a question of the welfare state. Those on the right often say
that if we don’t change direction, we’ll end up like Europe.
Meanwhile, Europe seems to finally be learning its lesson. Will we?
No comments:
Post a Comment