He fails to discriminate between friends and enemies.
By
Andrew C. McCarthy
Did
you catch Senator John McCain’s much-heralded (by Senator McCain) trip to the
Syrian civil war — by way of our NATO ally Turkey, the lifeline of the Hamas
terrorist organization? Yeah, Senator McCain blew into town to prove that all
of us dissenters from his latest adventure in “Democracy, Sharia Style” are
wacko birds. Surely, the Forward March of Freedom can work just as well in
Damascus as it has in Benghazi, Cairo, Baghdad, and Kabul.
Well,
he’s probably right about that.
The
Maverick is sensitive to the criticism that he has been a smidge less than
discriminating when it comes to sorting out America’s friends from America’s
mortal enemies. Thus, the immediate objective of his latest Middle Eastern
jaunt was to show that the anti-Assad “rebels” — I’d call them the Syrian
Mujahideen, which is how most of them think of themselves — are predominantly,
indeed overwhelmingly, secular and moderate. Oh, there may be a bad apple or two
in the rebel legions, but rest assured that the arsenal McCain wants to dole
out to them, in conjunction with U.S.-led aerial attacks on Assad’s forces,
will not be yet another exercise in arming the next anti-American jihad. Those
who claim we cannot tell the good guys from the bad guys are just a bunch of
craven isolationists.
How
unfortunate for the senator, then, that he managed, in the midst of this
scintillating exhibition, to get himself photographed
with Mohamed
Nour and Ammar al-Dadikhi (also known as “Abu Ibrahim”) — two
of the swell “rebels” from the very moderate “Northern Storm Brigade” who last
year kidnapped eleven Lebanese Shiite pilgrims. Nour is the chief spokesman for
the Brigade, which is still holding nine of the pilgrims captive.
Oops.
True
to form, McCain completely missed the point of his contretemps. His office
quickly issued a statement asserting that “it would be ludicrous to suggest
that the Senator in any way condones the kidnapping of Lebanese Shia pilgrims.”
Well, yes, that’s probably why no one is suggesting it (as Allahpundit explains
in an excellent analysis
at Hot Air). No one thinks the Beltway’s progressive Islamophilic consensus
affirmatively endorses the jihad. McCain & Co. are just willfully
blind to the fact that it thrives on their delusions.
McCain
is nothing if not consistent. There was the oops in Qaddafi’s
tent back in 2009, when McCain was urging more U.S. aid for
the Libyan regime — then acknowledged to be a critical counterterrorism ally of
the United States. That was only a few months before the Maverick abruptly
pivoted, deciding that the regime we’d been supporting needed to be overthrown.
This, he . . . er . . . reasoned, would
surely empower our new allies (or was it our old enemies?), the moderate rebels
of Benghazi — who were just back home from waging
years of jihad against America’s Islamic Democracy project in
Iraq. Just as he does now when it comes to Syria, McCain looked out on an
Islamic-supremacist sea, saw a couple of progressive islets, and pronounced the
rebels his “heroes”
— while they blared their Allahu Akbars, waved their black
jihadi flags, and carried
out their terrorist atrocities.
Oops
again.
There
is a stubborn fact Republicans may want to consider as McCain, their wayward
foreign-policy guru, tries to browbeat them into Libya Act II — because, you
know, Act I has worked out so well. It is this: The Obama administration’s
shocking derelictions of duty in connection with the Benghazi massacre cannot
erase the GOP fingerprints all over the Libyan debacle. Obama is the one who
took us over the cliff, but only after McCain shoved him to the very edge.
Obama’s
Libya war, which the president was pleased to lead from behind while McCain
whirled in front, was not authorized by Congress. This was fine by McCain, who
declared that saving
Benghazi was too important to delay over such constitutional
trivia as a green light from the American people’s representatives. After all,
what would America have done without Benghazi? So Libya now stands as a
treacherous precedent that a president may unilaterally take us to war, in
consultation with the Arab League’s Islamist regimes, under circumstances in
which not only are there no vital American interests to be served but our
intervention actually disserves our interests by empowering America’s enemies.
To
be generous, post-intervention Libya was a disaster long before our ambassador
and three other Americans were killed by jihadists nine months ago. Our
mysterious diplomatic facility in Benghazi had been a terrorist target for
months before September 11, 2012 — and the purpose for having a State
Department mission in a place so notoriously perilous for Americans has still not
been explained. Qaddafi’s weapons depots were raided by jihadists and now
facilitate their rampages across North Africa. In Libya itself, as Barry Rubin catalogues,
armed militias run rampant, Western facilities (such as the French embassy in
Tripoli) continue to be attacked, and the al-Qaeda-affiliated jihadists who
murdered our officials are the de
facto rulers of Benghazi. What passes for a central
government is too impotent to establish its authority.
This
was not an unforeseeable outcome. It was easily predictable for anyone willing
to see the region as it is rather than as he would have it. That will never be
Senator McCain, who, when not rubbing elbows with Syria’s motley jihadists this
week, was assuring us that Assad’s opponents “are just trying to achieve the
same thing that we have shed American blood and treasure for for well over 200
years.”
Yeah,
just like in Benghazi. And in Egypt, where a pogrom against Christians is
underway, and the Muslim Brotherhood government McCain joins Obama in
supporting has just installed a sharia constitution. And in Iraq, where Sunnis
and Shiites are back to slaughtering each other under the sharia constitution
our State Department helped them write. And in Afghanistan, where, under a
similar American-sponsored sharia constitution, the Taliban bides its time
while the U.S.-backed Islamist forces turn their guns on their American
trainers. And in Turkey, where an Islamic-supremacist regime jails its
political opponents, supports terrorist organizations, undermines sanctions
against Iran’s nuclear program, and gradually suffocates what was once a
pro-Western democracy.
Liberty
is not spread by fueling sharia supremacists. The futile hope that propitiating
America’s enemies will turn them into our friends is an Obama policy. Shouldn’t
the Republicans be offering an alternative — maybe something other than “oops”?
No comments:
Post a Comment