Shulman rallied for Rangel: Jason Furman, Media Matters, Fox News, Jarrett and a job.
By Jeffrey Lord
And the Liberal
Dog Whistle Blows.
Congressman
Charles Rangel of New York.
Ex-IRS
Commissioner Douglas Shulman.
The new chairman
of the president’s Council on Economic Advisors, Jason Furman.
And George
Soros, Media Matters, Gail Furman — Jason Furman’s mother — and Susan Anderson,
Douglas Shulman’s wife. Did I mention President Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Joe
Biden — and a post-IRS job for Douglas Shulman? A job he has now had to give up
in the wake of the IRS scandal.
Did I mention
Fox News?
Let’s get to it.
January 30,
2009.
The New York
Post headlined the story this way:
IRS
BIG PAYS RANGEL A VISIT
Wrote the Post
(bold print for emphasis):
The IRS’s top man came to
Harlem — and shared a stage with an accused tax cheat, Rep. Charles Rangel.
Commissioner Douglas Shulman and
other officials yesterday urged New Yorkers to get the most out of their tax
returns.
Asked about appearing with a
pol who’s being probed for failing to pay taxes, Shulman said, “He’s one of the
leaders in this country on tax policy issues. I work closely with him every
day, and I’m honored to be on this stage with him.
You read that
right.
As the tax
waters were quite publicly rising on Congressman Rangel — he would eventually
be censured by the House for among other things having
“shortchanged the IRS for 17 years by failing to pay taxes on income” and
forced to step aside as chairman of the tax writing House Ways and Means
Committee — IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman personally rode to Rangel’s
rescue.
The Harlem event was a campaign-style public relations function
featuring Rangel with Shulman and local officials at the Food Bank for New York
City. Rangel would in fact face not one but five challengers in the looming
2010 primary, with his opponents making much of his IRS problems. The food bank
benignly advertised the occasion this way:
As New York taxpayers begin the
February rush to file tax returns, IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman joins
Congressman Charles Rangel, NYC DCA Commissioner Jonathan Mintz, Food Bank
Pres. & CEO Dr. Lucy Cabrera, & Food Bank Chairman of the Board, the
Rev. Henry Belin, to discuss the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for low-wage
workers and options for free tax preparation.
Safe to say, IRS
commissioners are not famous for campaigning with politicians, much less
showing up for photo ops at a food bank. So why was Shulman lending the
prestige of the IRS to a man under withering fire as a tax cheat? And doing so
at a food bank event, of all things?
We’ll come back
to that question.
But the
tax-cheating powerful Rangel wasn’t the only one for whom the then-tax chief
Shulman had a soft spot.
The famous 157
White House visits made by Shulman — more than any other senior Obama appointee
— included six to Jason Furman.
Who is Jason
Furman?
You may now
recognize the name since just last week the Obama White House aide was promoted
by President Obama to the non-Senate confirmable post of Chairman of the
President’s Council of Economic Advisers. In 2009 Furman was Deputy Director of
the National Economic Council in the White House.
But there’s a
lot more to Jason Furman than being just another promoted White House aide with
a lofty governmental title, so we’ll come back to him in a minute.
LET’S START WITH
the Rangel-Shulman tale.
January 30,
2009.
Congressman
Charlie Rangel is in very big, very personal tax trouble with the IRS. As noted
in that news story — one of many news stories all over the mainstream media —
Rangel had “shortchanged” the IRS for 17 years. Seventeen years!
But IRS
Commissioner Douglas Shulman was only too happy to lend a very public IRS hand
to assist the liberal, tax-challenged Rangel.
Rangel’s tax
problems began in July of 2008, a mere eight months before the Harlem
Rangel/Shulman event when the Washington Post reported the following:
Rangel’s Pet
Cause Bears His Own Name
House Ways and Means Committee
Chairman Charles B. Rangel is soliciting donations from corporations with
business interests before his panel, hoping to raise $30 million for a new
academic center that will house his papers when he retires.
The story launched
a tornado of ethics problems for the longtime Harlem congressman. Stories
flowed from the mainstream media, including the New York Times, that
swirled around accusations of not paying federal taxes on various assets. There
was the villa in the Dominican Republic — on which he owed years of back taxes.
Then came issues of renting Harlem apartments at below-market value, using a
House of Representatives garage as a storage unit for his Mercedes-Benz, and
questions on unreported assets and income.
On September 14,
2008, even the New York Times editorial board had had enough of
Rangel’s tax problems, in an editorial titled “Chairman Rangel,” said:
Mounting embarrassment for taxpayers
and Congress makes it imperative that Representative Charles Rangel step aside
as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee while his ethical problems are
investigated.
None of this,
apparently, was a red flag for IRS Commissioner Shulman. Why not? After months
of a barrage of stories about Rangel’s problems with taxes and a mere four-plus
months after the liberal New York Times was calling for Rangel to step
aside, the IRS Commissioner was in Harlem at that food bank to personally lend
the quite public support of the IRS to the embattled, left-leaning,
tax-challenged Rangel.
Well aside from
the issue of political judgment for the head of the supposedly nonpartisan IRS
to be publicly campaigning for a man so publicly and repeatedly charged with
tax cheating — the Rangel episode raised the obvious issue of whether, under
the circumstances, Shulman was as obtuse as he appeared.
Was Douglas
Shulman really that politically dumb? Or was he, in the ways of the
left-leaning Washington Beltway crowd, clever, canny and smart?
Rangel was at
the time the head of the uber-powerful tax-writing House Ways and Means
Committee. The Food Bank of New York City lists as one of its “Mission Partners” the “Soros
Management Fund LLC” — that being the firm of George Soros, the left-wing
financial Godfather and funder of all manner of leftwing tax-exempt groups. The
latter including Media Matters.
If you are the
IRS Commissioner —and know you will eventually not be the IRS Commissioner and
yet still need a job — isn’t it smart to schmooze Mr. Chairman Rangel at a
Soros Funded food bank? After all, other than an unflattering story in the New
York Post — who cares?
But Shulman was
a Bush appointee, Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats like to point out.
In fact, when it
came time to pick a new IRS Commissioner at the end of the Bush administration,
as Bush White House press secretary Dana Perino has noted Democrats were not
about to approve a Bushie for the IRS job that carried a five-year term. Bush
was at the end of his second term, the GOP had already lost the 2006 election
that made Pelosi Speaker and Harry Reid the Majority Leader of the Senate — the
latter the place where IRS Commissioners are confirmed. Thus the IRS nominee
had to be acceptable to Democrats. This was the supposedly “non-partisan” IRS,
so the Bush administration simply decided this was one fight they didn’t need
in the middle of two wars and all the rest of Bush troubles. At the end of
November 2007, Shulman was nominated by Bush.
The last Bush
Secretary of the Treasury — for whom the IRS Commissioner works — was Hank
Paulson. Paulson, whose wife Wendy was an ardent Hillary Clinton supporter, had
already drawn attention from columnist Robert Novak for giving major Treasury appointments to
liberal Democrats. While the wealthy ex-Goldman Sachs head Paulson had in fact
given money to Republicans, he was also a big giver to Democrats like Bill
Clinton, Bill Bradley, Chuck Schumer and the left-wing feminist group Emily’s
List. Paulson, as Secretary, had a big voice in selecting an IRS Commissioner.
Concluded Novak of the people populating the Paulson Treasury Department :
It should be no surprise then that he
(Paulson) is regarded in his own administration as less a true Republican
secretary than a transition to the next Democratic Treasury — a trademark of a
lame-duck regime.
Thus — the Bush
appointment of Shulman, who is recorded by the Federal Elections Commission as a 2004
donor to the DNC in the year Bush won a close re-election over DNC candidate
John Kerry. The same Douglas Shulman whose wife Susan Anderson, as noted here in the Daily Caller’s story by Patrick
Howley, “works for liberal group fighting open campaign spending” as “the
senior program advisor.”
The FEC also records Shulman’s wife Susan Anderson, the “Senior Program
Adv” (adviser) for “Public Campaign,” as a donor to the left-wing Progressive
Majority. In the so-far-an-interesting-coincidence category, Progressive
Majority president Gloria Totten was listed as attending “Dinner 7” in a series
of dinners for the liberal Women’s Campaign Fund, a 501(c)(4). Listed as a “co-host”
of “Dinner 1” was — Gail Furman. Jason Furman’s mother.
Whatever else
this network of well-connected liberals says about the ex-IRS Commissioner, it
is plain that Shulman himself is well connected in the world of Washington and
liberal politics and big money.
In fact, after
Shulman’s exit from the IRS but before the IRS scandal exploded, Shulman was on
track to take a director’s job at CBOE Holdings Inc. in Chicago. The scandal
exploded and Shulman has withdrawn. But the publicity brought attention to this
telling boast of connections by CBOE inside the Obama White House. Said outgoing CBOE chairman William Brodsky in the Chicago
Tribune, reflecting on a possible job offer for himself in the Obama
administration:
“I have a whole bunch of friends in
this administration, including that guy there,” Brodsky said, gesturing toward
several photos, including one with a handwritten note from President Barack
Obama. “(Vice President Joe) Biden and I went to law school together, and
Valerie Jarrett and I have been friends for 20-some-odd years. If it were a
different administration, it probably would not be a consideration. But this is
not the top of my mind right now. The top of my mind is to make sure we have a
good transition here.”
Up until May
21 that “good transition” included plans for Shulman to become a director
of CBOE.
This liberal
network can easily explain Shulman’s 157 visits to the White House. It explains
as well how Shulman could sit before an investigating committee of Congress and
smirk that the only trip to the White House he could recall was for the Easter
Egg Roll. It also makes perfect sense that Shulman would get a post-IRS job
offer from a company whose CEO boasted of long relationships with the President
himself, with Vice President Biden, and with Valerie Jarrett.
So too can the
liberal network easily explain why Douglas Shulman felt it necessary to be
calling on Jason Furman, the senior White House economic aide whose mother was
well known in left-wing circles as, along with George Soros the Harlem Food
Bank funder, a serious funder for Media Matters. Media Matters, the
left-wing 501(c)(3) that mysteriously escaped the attention of the Shulman-run
IRS.
On the surface?
Maybe Shulman and Furman were just talking economic matters. But nothing is as
it seems in Washington. A President covered-up Watergate while saying he would
never dream of it. Another President really did have “sexual relations with
that woman, Ms. Lewinsky,” even though he insisted that he would never dream of
such a thing.
SO. LET’S MOVE
ON from Shulman’s politicking ways with the liberal and powerful Charlie Rangel
to Shulman’s White House meetings with Jason Furman.
Just appointed
the other day as the new Chairman of the President’s Council of Economic
Advisers, Furman received 6 of those 157 White House visits from Shulman when
Furman was still just Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, a job
he took when President Obama entered the White House in 2009.
It is a common
mistake to look at lofty government titles that seemingly proclaim political
neutrality when in fact the person occupying that job has considerable personal
political ties. Jason Furman is exactly this kind of government official.
Furman was visited by Mr. Shulman at least 6 of those 157 times, none of them,
it seems, in the month in which the Easter Egg Roll took place. The White House
records those visits as follows, with the letters “Ww” standing for “West Wing”
— as in West Wing of the White House, home to both the Oval Office and the
president’s most powerful senior aides.
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
09/25/2009 16:30
Meeting Room: Ww […]
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
12/01/2009 13:00
Meeting Room: Ww […]
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
01/06/2010 14:00
Meeting Room: Ww […]
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
02/17/2010 14:30
Meeting Room: Ww […]
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
10/29/2010 17:00
Meeting Room: Ww […]
Shulman, Douglas Furman, Jason
11/16/2010 15:30
Meeting Room: Ww
What, in fact,
is Jason Furman’s background?
Why all this
personal attention to Furman from the IRS Commissioner? What are Furman’s
political relationships that would raise a red flag about Douglas Shulman
spending even one of his 157 White House visits with Jason Furman, much less
six? What is it about the IRS that means it has to be coordinated with
left-wing economic policy? Furman’s formal job, after all, was about economic
policy — not the in-the-weeds implementation of Obamacare. The latter in which
the IRS has a most serious role indeed.
And what does
Jason Furman have in common with — Congressman Charlie Rangel?
Answer?
What Rangel and
Furman have common is the perception of real power and influence in that
liberal network — the kind of power and influence that goes well beyond the
surface job descriptions of being a mere Congressman from Harlem or some
economic staff guy to the president.
For Rangel, this
power was his position as Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.
And Furman?
If one reads his
official White House biography (here)
you get the standard bureaucratese.
Not mentioned is
that Jason Furman is the son of Gail Furman, a wealthy Manhattan psychologist
and philanthropist who heads the left-wing Furman Foundation. Gail Furman is a
donor to Media Matters and served as a board member of the similarly George
Soros-funded Democracy Alliance. She is also a donor to the Soros-backed J
Street, the Tides Foundation, and the Center for American Progress. Jason
Furman’s brother Jesse Furman, a lawyer and one-time treasurer of the Furman Foundation,
was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
in 2009 by President Obama and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
The power of the
Furman Foundation was more than enough to elicit this question in Jesse
Furman’s confirmation hearing from Iowa Republican Senator Charles Grassley:
GRASSLEY: You served as Treasurer of
The Furman Foundation, a family foundation. This Foundation has donated money
to a number of liberal organizations and causes, such as the Alliance for Justice,
Media Matters, and People for the American Way. While there is nothing wrong
with that, it may concern future litigants, should you be confirmed.
a. Did you have any decision-making
authority regarding where or to whom the Foundation donated money?
FURMAN: As Treasurer of the Furman
Foundation from 2000 to 2008, I did not have any decision-making authority
regarding where or to whom the Foundation donated money. The Foundation was
established and funded entirely by my mother, and she exercised exclusive
authority over decisions about where and to whom the Foundation donated money.”
So the obvious
question.
If the
relationship of the Furman Foundation to Obama judicial nominee Jesse Furman
was enough of a red flag to have Senator Grassley inquiring, was that
reputation strong enough to quietly motivate the IRS not to look into the tax
exempt status of the Furman-funded Media Matters? As well as other left-leaning
501(c)(3)’s?
Just as in the
fashion that caused IRS Commissioner Shulman to play the Washington power game
and lend the prestige of the IRS to an embattled, tax-challenged but powerful
Congressman Rangel — the same IRS Commissioner was repeatedly trooping into
Jason Furman’s White House West Wing office. While at the same time the IRS
that somehow found the time to investigate the tax exempt status of
conservative groups mysteriously couldn’t find the time to investigate Media
Matters. The very same Media Matters that is funded by Jason and Obama judicial
nominee Jesse’s mother Gail. In the same liberal network where a group — the
Progressive Majority — gets a contribution from Shulman’s wife — and sends its
president, Gloria Totten, to a series of dinners for yet another liberal group
where a co-host is…Jason Furman’s mother.
Coincidence?
Ahhhhh. But what
was going on with Fox News and the Obama Administration while Shulman of the
IRS was busy visiting Jason Furman in the White House in all those recorded
visits between September of 2009 and November of 2010?
Recall?
Sure you do.
That was the time when the Obama had declared war on Fox News.
On October 19,
2009 — less than a month after IRS Commissioner Shulman paid his first visit on
Jason Furman in the White House West Wing — the Associated Press was headlining this story:
White House steps up attacks
on Fox News
Wrote the AP:
WASHINGTON — White House advisers
have stepped up their attacks on Fox News, claiming the cable television
network is a Republican mouthpiece whose programming “is geared toward making
money.”
….Last week, White House
communications director Anita Dunn said Fox News operates “almost as either the
research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party.”
On Sunday, Rahm
Emanuel, President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, said, “It is not a news
organization so much as it has a perspective.”
Tough looks at the
administration
Fox News commentators Glenn Beck and
Sean Hannity have been strong Obama critics, and Bill O’Reilly has taken tough
looks at the administration. Obama avoided “Fox News Sunday” when he visited
five Sunday morning news shows last month; three aides carried the
administration’s message on Afghanistan, health care and the economy this
Sunday to ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC, but not Fox; and a recent White House blog
post accused Beck of lying. Beck has called Obama a racist.
Over at Media
Matters, the Daily Caller would later report that “Media Matters for America founder David Brock
and president Eric Burns” were in receipt of a memo explaining that “Media
Matters should launch a ‘Fox Fund’ whose mission would be to attack the Fox
News Channel.”
Now.
STAY FOCUSED ON
IRS Commissioner Shulman.
By the fall of
2009, Shulman has already — nine months earlier — had a quiver in his political
antennae that told him — appearances be damned — he should show up at the
literal side of the tax-challenged Congressman Charlie Rangel at a Soros-funded
Food Bank in New York to send the message that tax challenged or not, the IRS
loved Charlie.
Now, the Obama
White House is in full-blown attack mode against Fox News. And the man Shulman
is seeing for the first of 6 meetings in those 157 that are not the Easter Egg
Role — is with the Obama aide who is the son of a serious funder with Soros not
just of Media Matters but other liberal 501(c)(3)’s as well.
For a man with
the exquisite sense of Inside-the-Beltway and liberal network politics that
Shulman possesses — it’s a reasonable question to ask: Where was the IRS
scrutiny of Media Matters? Or was that very exquisite sense of liberal network
politics — watching the Obama White House itself at its most senior levels go
after the same target as the Soros/Furman funded Media Matters while
simultaneously attacking the Tea Party — a signal not just to the bureaucrats
in the IRS but the Commissioner as well?
By 2011, Media
Matters was virtually begging for IRS attention.
As Politico
headlined here on March 27, 2011:
Media Matters’ war against
Fox
The liberal group Media Matters has
quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock,
described in an interview as an all-out campaign of “guerrilla warfare and
sabotage” aimed at the Fox News Channel.
The group, launched as a more
traditional media critic, has all but abandoned its monitoring of newspapers
and other television networks and is narrowing its focus to Fox and a handful
of conservative websites, which its leaders view as political organizations and
the “nerve center” of the conservative movement…
No sooner was
this transformation of the group’s original purpose publicly stated than Fox
itself picked up the challenge, as Politico also noted
— bold print for emphasis:
Fox News takes on Media
Matters
For seven years, Fox News has pushed
back against the daily scrutiny and criticism leveled at it by Media Matters,
the liberal watchdog group. But after founder David Brock said in March
that his group’s new strategy amounted to a “war on Fox,” the network
ratcheted up its response.
In the past 10 days, Fox has
run more than 30 segments calling for the nonprofit group to be stripped of its
tax-exempt status. Its Fox Nation website has even provided a link to
pre-completed complaint forms against Media Matters to send to the Internal
Revenue Service.
…“Media Matters is not a media
investigative organization,” Fox News contributor and Washington Post columnist
Charles Krauthammer said on “Special Report With Bret Baier” last week. “It’s a
war on Fox. And you’re allowed to do that in a democracy. You can be as nasty
as you want. The only thing is, don’t ask for a government subsidy.”
To get tax-free status, educational
nonprofits have to support their claims with facts and refrain from directly
engaging in politics — though they can be as ideological as they like. Fox
argues that Media Matters has veered from that educational mission and should
be stripped of its special status.
Former White
House Counsel in the Bush 41 administration, Boyden Gray, laid out the case in
a Washington Times column, pointing out:
MMA was originally established as an
Internal Revenue Service Section 501(c)(3) organization, that is, an
organization that can receive tax-deductible contributions to engage in
educational activities.
What MMA actually is doing, however,
moves far afield from identifying possible bias to mounting a campaign to
undermine a major media outlet and to promote the Democratic Party and
progressive causes associated with it. Mr. Brock himself has described this new
strategy as “a war on Fox,” an effort “to disrupt [Rupert Murdoch‘s] commercial
interests” and look for ways to turn regulators against News Corp.’s media
outlets.
MMA’s activities should disallow its
tax-exempt status in two fundamental ways. First, IRS rulings make clear that
attacks on individuals, statement of positions that are unsupported by facts
and use of inflammatory language and other distortions will cost an
organization its tax-free status. Second, in declaring “guerrilla warfare” on
Fox as the “leader” and “mouthpiece” of the Republican Party and in developing
a sophisticated Democratic-leaning media training boot camp, MMA has
transformed itself into an aggressive advocate for Democratic and progressive
causes and thus produced a second deviation from exempt educational activities.
The call for the
IRS to take another look at Media Matters could not have been louder or more
public.
But IRS
Commissioner Shulman was missing in action. The IRS was now well down the path
in investigating conservative groups and various Tea Parties.
Media Matters?
Have the IRS apply the same standards to Media Matters that it was applying to
these conservative and Tea Party groups? The IRS Commissioner himself had been
having frequent meetings with the son of one of the Media Matters donors. In a
White House that was itself very publicly attacking the same target Media
Matters had declared war against — Fox News. In fact, in 2010, Douglas
Shulman’s own wife was giving money to the Progressive Majority whose president
was attending 2010 anti-conservative fundraising dinners.
The liberal dog
whistle was blowing loud and clear to any and every liberal in the liberal
network.
The IRS
Commissioner who thought himself savvy enough to go to Harlem and stand with
one of the most famous tax cheaters in America was surely not thinking himself
dumb enough to launch an investigation of Media Matters.
Did Douglas
Shulman ever discuss Media Matters or liberal groups or tax exempt status or
the Tea Party or Fox News with White House aide Jason Furman during his many
visits? Did Douglas Shulman have to discuss Charlie Rangel’s tax status with
Charlie Rangel during his visit to Harlem? Did Douglas Shulman need to discuss
a job offer in Chicago with the President, the Vice President or Valerie
Jarrett during those 157 visits?
Maybe.
Maybe not.
Just maybe he
didn’t need to.
Because IRS
Commissioner Douglas Shulman heard the Liberal Dog Whistle blow.
Related Reading:
Wife of 'Bush-Appointee-So-He-Couldn't-Be-Behind-Some-Conservative-Bashing-In-His-Agency,' Doug Shulman, Former IRS Commissioner, Is An #Occupy Loon And Tea Party Basher. I'm Shocked! Not.
The President, The Left, The IRS, And A Timeline Of Tyranny.
'The IRS Targeting Jewish Groups? PUHlease, You Nutty, Conspiracy Theorist!'
Oh, My...Just When You Thought That It Couldn't Get Any Worse... Obama's IRS Went After A Survivor Of A Japanese Concentration Camp For Her Political Speech
Obama & The Internal Revenge Service
‘When Fascism Comes to America . . .’
Wife of 'Bush-Appointee-So-He-Couldn't-Be-Behind-Some-Conservative-Bashing-In-His-Agency,' Doug Shulman, Former IRS Commissioner, Is An #Occupy Loon And Tea Party Basher. I'm Shocked! Not.
The President, The Left, The IRS, And A Timeline Of Tyranny.
'The IRS Targeting Jewish Groups? PUHlease, You Nutty, Conspiracy Theorist!'
Oh, My...Just When You Thought That It Couldn't Get Any Worse... Obama's IRS Went After A Survivor Of A Japanese Concentration Camp For Her Political Speech
Obama & The Internal Revenge Service
‘When Fascism Comes to America . . .’
No comments:
Post a Comment