By Conor Friedersdor
Asked about the strike that killed him, a senior adviser to the
president's campaign suggests he should've "had a more responsible
father."
Cornered by reporters with video cameras, former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, a senior adviser to President Obama's reelection campaign, attempted to defend the kill list that the Obama Administration uses to determine whose body should next be blown apart. American drone strikes have resulted in hundreds of dead innocents in the last four years, even as the program has killed a number of high-level al Qaeda terrorists. There are two remarkable things about the ensuing exchange, which eventually turns into a discussion about a dead 16-year-old kid:
Cornered by reporters with video cameras, former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, a senior adviser to President Obama's reelection campaign, attempted to defend the kill list that the Obama Administration uses to determine whose body should next be blown apart. American drone strikes have resulted in hundreds of dead innocents in the last four years, even as the program has killed a number of high-level al Qaeda terrorists. There are two remarkable things about the ensuing exchange, which eventually turns into a discussion about a dead 16-year-old kid:
He was the son of Anwar al-Awlaki, who was also born in America, who
was also an American citizen, and who was killed by drone two weeks
before his son was, along with another American citizen named Samir
Khan. Of course, both Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan were, at the very
least, traitors to their country -- they had both gone to Yemen and taken
up with Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and al-Awlaki had proven
himself an expert inciter of those with murderous designs against
America and Americans: the rare man of words who could be said to have a
body count. When he was killed, on September 30, 2011, President Obama made a speech about it;
a few months later, when the Obama administraton's public-relations
campaign about its embrace of what has come to be called "targeted
killing" reached its climax in a front-page story in the New York Times
that presented the President of the United States as the last word in
deciding who lives and who dies, he was quoted as saying that the
decision to put Anwar al-Awlaki on the kill list -- and then to kill him --
was "an easy one."
But Abdulrahman al-Awlaki wasn't on an American kill list.
Nor was he a member of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninusla.
Nor was he
“an inspiration,” as his father styled himself, for those determined to
draw American blood.
Nor had he gone “operational,” as American
authorities said his father had, in drawing up plots against Americans
and American interests.
He was a boy who hadn’t seen his father in two
years, since his father had gone into hiding.
He was a boy, who knew his
father was on an American kill list and who snuck out of his family’s
home in the early morning hours of 4 September 2011, to try to find
him.
He was a boy who was still searching for his father when his father
was killed, and who, on the night he himself was killed, was saying
goodbye to the second cousin with whom he’d lived while on his search,
and the friends he’d made.
He was a boy among boys, then; a boy among
boys eating dinner by an open fire along the side of a road when an
American drone came out of the sky and fired the missiles that killed
them all.
How does Team Obama justify killing him?
The answer Robert Gibbs gave is chilling:
ADAMSON: …It’s an American citizen that
is being targeted without due process, without trial. And, he’s underage. He’s
a minor.
GIBBS: I would suggest that you should
have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well
being of their children. I don’t think becoming an al Qaeda jihadist terrorist
is the best way to go about doing your business.
Again, note that this kid wasn’t killed in the same drone strike as
his father. He was hit by a drone strike elsewhere, and by the time he
was killed, his father had already been dead for two weeks. Gibbs
nevertheless defends the strike, not by arguing that the kid was a
threat, or that killing him was an accident, but by saying that his late
father irresponsibly joined al Qaeda terrorists.
Killing an American
citizen without due process on that logic ought to be grounds for
impeachment. Is that the real answer? Or would the Obama Administration
like to clarify its reasoning? Any Congress that respected its oversight
responsibilities would get to the bottom of this.
Sophie: Keep in mind, too that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL in the United States to execute a minor or a defendant sentenced for a crime committed as a minor.
No comments:
Post a Comment