By Margaret Wente, Canada's The Globe & Mail
The moral imperative is clear, he argued. We cannot let dictators get
away with this. On the other hand, the United States can’t be expected
to solve all the world’s problems, either. Therefore, the way ahead is
to outsource U.S. foreign policy on Syria to … Vladimir Putin!
So
much for the credibility of the world’s only superpower. Mr. Obama’s
staff have been tweeting that this delaying tactic is an incredible
display of smart diplomacy. But to most of us, it just makes him look
gullible. The President has allowed himself to be hog-tied and
hornswoggled by Lilliputians. He was determined not to repeat the
mistakes of the past, when a blundering giant threw its weight around
and only wound up showing the world how incompetent it is. But if
there’s one thing worse than being a blundering giant, it’s being a
98-pound weakling.
On Thursday, Mr. Putin kicked more sand in his face. On the op-ed page of The New York Times no less, he lectured
Mr. Obama on diplomacy and peace. “From the outset, Russia has
advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise
plan for their own future,” he said with a straight face. “We are not
protecting the Syrian government, but international law.”
This
from the guy who has been arming Bashar al-Assad to the teeth and
blocking the United Nations from doing anything about it. Mr. al-Assad
has been using Russian weapons to slaughter his own people.
I
guess it’s always possible that the Syrian dictator (memorably likened
to a “human toothbrush” by Christopher Hitchens) will immediately
surrender his stockpiles of chemical weapons (which he has claimed he
doesn’t have), welcome UN weapons inspectors with open arms and give
armed protection to the squads of experts who will be necessary to
decommission and destroy his various caches of nerve gas, who will
somehow do their jobs in the midst of a the bloody civil war that has
already destroyed half the country. Or maybe the UN can send in
peacekeepers to put it under international control. Or maybe the Easter
Bunny will intervene.
More likely is that Mr. al-Assad will use
the newly opened diplomatic track to obfuscate, delay, prevaricate and
continue killing people, while tying up the process in endless
procedural knots. He has now promised to sign the UN Chemical Weapons
Treaty – just not quite yet, and only if the U.S. stops arming the rebels, and only if Israel ratifies it first.
Like
most everybody else, I’m confused as hell over Syria. The trouble is,
Mr. Obama is confused, too. This is not reassuring. He appears to be
making it up as he goes along. The only thing that’s clear is that he
hates – really hates – being commander-in-chief. He was the guy who was
going to get the United States out of all of George W. Bush’s messes.
And now this!
Mr. Bush’s problem was that once he made decisions,
he never second-guessed himself. Mr. Obama’s problem is that he
overthinks. He changes his mind and paints himself into a corner. At
first, he said Mr. al-Assad had to go. Then he said regime change wasn’t
in the cards. He said there was a red line Mr. al-Assad mustn’t cross.
Then, when Mr. al-Assad crossed it, he said it wasn’t his red line, it
was the world’s – even as it became excruciatingly clear that the world
wasn’t about to do a thing about it.
He said Syria poses no threat
to America, but also that attacking it would be in the national
interest. On his own, he decided to seek Congressional approval – then
trapped himself when it turned out Americans had no taste for another
foreign (mis)adventure of the kind he had promised to extricate them
from.
No wonder seasoned foreign-policy types are tearing their
hair out in clumps. “Words like ad hoc and improvised and unsteady come
to mind,” Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations,
told the Times.
I’ve always been deeply skeptical of the case for
intervening, for the simple reason that it might wind up doing more harm
than good. The two strongest reasons, it seems to me, were to show that
there are consequences for violating international norms, and to
demonstrate that the United States means what it says.
But Mr.
Obama doesn’t really mean what he says. So why should anybody take him
seriously? In fact, there are no consequences, and everything he and his
comically inept sidekick John Kerry have said about human rights and
justice and the “moral obscenity” of chemical weapons is just a bunch of
hot air. His message to rogue states like Iran is: You can get away
with anything. His message to greater powers such as China is that he’s
incapable of strategic thinking. And his message to allies such as
Israel is that they can’t rely on him to have their back.
Mr.
Obama’s Middle East policy is in ruins. He looks like he’s way over his
head. Now he’s let himself get rolled by the biggest bully on the block.
In the immortal words of Mr. Kerry, he looks “unbelievably small.” And that’s not good.
http://tinyurl.com/kuh8mda
No comments:
Post a Comment