By
John McCormack
On
Friday, Arizona congressman Trent Franks announced he will be introducing a bill to prohibit abortions after the fifth month of
pregnancy, with exceptions for when the mother's life or physical
health is at risk. NARAL president Ilyse Hogue condemned the
modest restriction in a statement:
“Rep. Franks is using
this bill in a shameless effort to exploit the terrible tragedy in Pennsylvania
where Kermit Gosnell was just convicted of murder for performing illegal
abortions that resulted in killing of infants and women. The women of America
deserve better.
“Gosnell was a
criminal whose activities were made possible by the very kind of anti-choice
policies Franks is advancing. By cutting funding, reducing access and imposing
unnecessary restrictions on safe and legal abortion, anti-choice politicians
have forced women – especially low-income women – into the waiting hands of
unscrupulous operators like Kermit Gosnell.
“We will fight this
senseless attack and protect the rights of all women.”
Franks's bill would
ban most abortions after 20 weeks of gestation, the point at which
babies can feel pain and the point at which some babies can survive long-term
if born:
"In June 2009,
the Journal of the American Medical Association reported a
Swedish series of over 300,000 infants," Dr. Colleen Malloy testified before Congress in 2012.
"Survival to one year of life of live born infants at 20, 21, 22, 23, and
24 weeks postfertilization age was 10%, 53%, 67%, 82%, and 85%,
respectively." So a law restricting abortion after 20 weeks would not run
afoul of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's dictate that abortion must not
be restricted prior to "viability."
Franks's new bill
will be debated in the wake of the murder trial and conviction of abortion
doctor Kermit Gosnell, who killed infants immediately after they were born by
severing their spinal cords. That trial left many Americans asking
what the moral difference is between killing a baby born at six months and
killing that same infant moments before birth. "What we need to learn from
the Gosnell case is that late-term abortion is infanticide," wrote liberal
columnist Kirsten Powers. "Legal infanticide."
Although Gosnell is
behind bars, tens of thousands of late-term abortions (or "legal
infanticides," if you will) take place in America every year. Dr. LeRoy
Carhart has said he will perform "purely elective" abortions on babies 28 weeks into pregnancy in the state of Maryland. Another late-term abortion
doctor named James Pendergraft says he will perform even later
abortions under Maryland's "health exception" if a pregnancy is
causing "anxiety and stress."
Although
congressional Republicans usually prefer state laws to federal laws, the 2003
partial-birth abortion ban passed Congress with the support of even the
staunchest federalists, including former congressman Ron Paul of Texas. The
Gosnell trial highlighted the need for federal laws regulating late-term
abortions because the state of Pennsylvania turned a blind eye to Gosnell's
"house of horrors." Gosnell's abortion facility was not inspected by the Pennsylvania government for 17 years.
A resolution introduced
by Sen. Mike Lee of Utah and Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania called on Congress
to "evaluate the extent to which such abortions involve violations of
the civil right to life of infants who are born alive or are capable
of being born alive, and therefore are entitled to equal protection
under the law."
http://tinyurl.com/krm3wrt
No comments:
Post a Comment