By Andrew C McCarthy
As
Egypt under the heel of Mohamed Morsi unravels, here’s the late-breaking
news: The Muslim Brotherhood is the enemy of democracy.
This has always been obvious to anyone who took the time to look into
it. Nevertheless, it has not been an easy point to make lo these many
years. Even as the Justice Department proved beyond any doubt in court
that the Brotherhood’s major goal in America and Europe — its
self-professed “grand jihad” — is “eliminating and destroying Western civilization,” to have the temerity to point this out is to be smeared as an “Islamophobe.” That’s the Islamophilic Left’s code for “racist.”
Nor is it just the Left. Like the transnational progressives who hold
sway in Democratic circles, many of the neoconservative thinkers who
have captured Republican foreign-policy making encourage “outreach” to
“moderate Islamists” — a ludicrously self-contradictory term. The idea
is to collaborate in the construction of “Islamic democracies.” That’s
another nonsensical term — to borrow
Michael Rubin’s quote of a moderate Muslim academic piqued by the
encroachments of Turkey’s ruling Islamists, “We are a democracy. Islam
has nothing to do with it.” That is clearly right. Yet, to argue the
chimerical folly of the sharia-democracy experiment is to be demagogued
as an “isolationist.”
It is as if the Right can no longer fathom an engaged foreign policy
that concentrates solely on vital U.S. interests and treats America’s
enemies as, well, enemies.
Of course, it is neither Islamophobic nor isolationist to observe
that Islamic supremacism is derived from literal Muslim scripture; that
it is a mainstream interpretation of Islam whose adherents, far from
being limited to a “violent extremist” fringe, number in the hundreds of
millions and include many of Islam’s most influential thinkers and
institutions. These are simply facts. Nor is it Islamophobic or
isolationist to contend that any sensible engagement with Islamic
supremacists — very much including the Muslim Brotherhood — ought to be
aimed at their marginalization and defeat, not their cultivation and
empowerment. This is not a popular view; opinions amply supported by
unpleasant facts are rarely popular. But following it would strengthen
pro-Western Muslims while promoting an American global engagement that
is essential, effective, and affordable. That is the very antithesis of
Islamophobia and isolationism.
The central contention here has been that the Muslim Brotherhood is
an innately, incorrigibly Islamic-supremacist outfit. Wherever it
establishes a presence, it seeks — as gradually as indigenous conditions
require, and as rapidly as they allow — to implement its repressive
construction of sharia. Wherever it gets the opportunity to rule, it
uses its power to impose this sharia, despite resistance from the
society’s non-Islamist factions.
This is not a mere theory. Egypt, the world’s most important Arab
country, is violently convulsing before our eyes in direct reaction to
the suffocation that is Islamist rule. So, will we finally take the
lesson? Will we finally come to understand why democracy and Islamic
supremacism cannot coexist?
Western democracy has Judeo-Christian underpinnings. At its core is
the equal dignity of every person. This sacred commitment, ironically,
enables our bedrock secular guarantee: freedom of conscience. It is
anathema to the Brotherhood. As their guiding jurist, Sheikh Yusuf
Qaradawi, teaches: “Secularism can never enjoy general acceptance in an
Islamic society.” This is because “the acceptance of secularism means
abandonment of sharia.”
Now, maybe you doubt this. Maybe you think “Islamic democracy” enthusiasts like Hillary Clinton, edified by her trusty aide Huma Abedin,
know more about sharia than Sheikh Qaradawi does. But let’s just say I
doubt it — and I am quite certain that the ummah would laugh, and then
probably riot, at such a suggestion.
The Brothers really do believe what they say. They especially believe what Qaradawi says.
Obama officials tirelessly portray the Brotherhood as a normal,
“largely secular” organization. Other Western progressives nod their
heads in unison. Even with Egypt aflame over Morsi’s aggressive
constitution gambit — the fulfillment of his campaign promise of a
constitution that would reflect “the sharia, then the sharia, and
finally the sharia” — New York Times Cairo bureau chief David Kirkpatrick assures
Hugh Hewitt’s listeners that the Brotherhood is a “moderate, regular
old political force” that “just want[s] to win elections.” The Brothers,
you are to conclude, are just an Islamic analogue to Europe’s Christian Democrats.
This is worse than lunacy. It is the most irresponsible brand of
willful blindness. Mr. Kirkpatrick, in fact, amplifies his see-no-sharia
analysis with a whopper: You oughtn’t render harsh judgments about the
Brothers’ intentions because, “you know, you don’t know what their
ultimate vision of . . . the good life looks like.”
Actually, they could not have made themselves clearer on that
subject. Perhaps you’ve heard: “Allah is our objective, the Prophet is
our leader, the Koran is our law, jihad is our way, and dying in the way
of Allah is our highest hope.” Islam, in this ultimate vision, cannot
tolerate secular democracy because sharia — the “Koran is our law” part
of the equation — will not abide it.
Sharia, Qaradawi elaborates, is a “comprehensive system” of
“legislation” derived directly from “Allah’s injunctions.” Our notion of
secularism, in which sovereignty belongs to the people, is for Qaradawi
a “denial of the divine guidance.”
Imposition of the divine guidance is the Brotherhood’s raison d’être.
As explained after Mubarak’s fall by Khairat al-Shater, the Brothers’
strategic leader and Morsi’s patron, “to subjugate people to God on
earth” — “to organize our life and the lives of the people on the basis
of Islam” — is “our main and overall mission as Muslim Brothers.”
The draft constitution the Brothers are currently trying to force on
Egyptians elucidates their idea of the “basis of Islam” to which people
must be subjugated. The Hudson Institute’s Samuel Tadros expertly analyzed
it this week on the Corner. The Brothers make the “principles of
sharia” the cornerstone of law; squelch authentic moderate reformers by
stipulating that “principles” are limited to the four established Sunni
jurisprudential schools (which consider all questions to have been
settled by the tenth century); and vest in the fundamentalist scholars
of ancient al-Azhar University a dispositive role in interpreting sharia
— similar to the mullahs of Shiite Iran.
There is more. The new constitution tellingly strikes the old
constitution’s reference to “citizenship” — a term that implied equality
between Muslims and non-Muslims — as the basis for Egypt’s political
order. It empowers the Islamist state to “entrench . . . moral values”
in society by enforcing the Islamist ideal of “family values.” It denies
freedom of conscience by refusing many religious minorities the right
to worship. Although Christianity is not outlawed, the finances of
Christian churches are placed under government control — enabling the
creation of a Communist-style national church, subject to Islamist
domination. It denies freedom of expression by adopting sharia’s
repressive blasphemy laws, under which any criticism of Islam is
brutally punished. It deletes
the former constitution’s express guarantee of equality for women “in
the fields of political, social, cultural, and economic life.”
Phony “teachable moments” abound in the era of Obama moralizing, but
this one is worth our attention: Egypt is the Brotherhood unleashed.
This week’s despotic bloodletting is the natural, logical, entirely predictable
end of the Brotherhood’s machinations — not just in Egypt but
everyplace the Brothers operate. That includes the United States, where
our government takes their counsel, invites them to shape our
national-security policy, and gives them a veto over the content of
materials used to train our law-enforcement, military, and intelligence
agents.
It is long past time to realize that this is not a game. The Brothers are playing for keeps.
— Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom Center. He is the author, most recently, of Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, which was published by Encounter Books.
No comments:
Post a Comment