It won't be easy, you'll think it strange
When we try to explain how we feel
That we still need your love after all that we've done
By MAUREEN DOWD
“I, I’m so in love with you,” Barack Obama crooned to a thrilled crowd
at a fund-raiser at the Apollo in Harlem on Thursday night, doing a
seductive imitation as Al Green himself looked on.
The song would make a good campaign anthem: “Let’s stay together, lovin’
you whether, whether times are good or bad, happy or sad.” Don’t break
up, turn around and make up.
Times have been bad and sad, and The One did not turn out to be a
messiah, just a mortal politician who ruefully jokes that his talent is
hitting the “sweet spot” where he makes no one happy, neither allies nor
opponents.
The man who became famous with a speech declaring that we were one
America, not opposing teams of red and blue states, presides over an
America more riven by blue and red than ever.
The man who came to Washington on a wave of euphoria has had a
presidency with all the joy of a root canal, dragged down by W.’s
recklessness and his own inability to read America’s panic and its
thirst for a strong leader.
In an interview with Fareed Zakaria for this week’s Time cover story, the president is maddeningly naïve.
Don't cry for us, America
The truth is we never left you
All through our incompetence
Our mad existence
We'll do better. We promise
All through our incompetence
Our mad existence
We'll do better. We promise
Don't keep your distance
Asked about his cool, aloof style and his unproductive relationship with
John Boehner, Obama replied: “You know, the truth is, actually, when it
comes to Congress, the issue is not personal relationships. My
suspicion is that this whole critique has to do with the fact that I
don’t go to a lot of Washington parties. And as a consequence, the
Washington press corps maybe just doesn’t feel like I’m in the mix
enough with them, and they figure, well, if I’m not spending time with
them, I must be cold and aloof. The fact is, I’ve got a 13-year-old and
10-year-old daughter.”
Reagan didn’t socialize with the press. He spent his evenings with
Nancy, watching TV with dinner trays. But he knew that to transcend, you
can’t condescend.
The portrait of the first couple in Jodi Kantor’s new book, “The
Obamas,” bristles with aggrievement and the rational president’s disdain
for the irrational nature of politics, the press and Republicans.
Despite what his rivals say, the president and the first lady do believe
in American exceptionalism — their own, and they feel overassaulted and
underappreciated.
We disappointed them.
And as for fortune, and as for fame
We never invited them in
Though it seemed to the world they were all we desired
We are illusions
We're not the solutions we promised to be
But you're racist for noticing
We love you and hope you love us
Don't cry for us, America
As Michelle said to Oprah in an interview she did with the president
last May: “I always told the voters, the question isn’t whether Barack
Obama is ready to be president. The question is whether we’re ready. And that continues to be the question we have to ask ourselves.”
They still believed, as their friend Valerie Jarrett once said, that
Obama was “just too talented to do what ordinary people do.”
As Kantor reports, when the president met with Democratic members of
Congress who had lost their seats in the midterms because of an
incoherent White House economic and jobs strategy, he did not seem to
comprehend the anxiety that had spawned the Tea Party, or feel any
regret. Jim Oberstar, who lost his long-held Minnesota perch, recalled
Obama’s saying, “In the end, this is for the greater good of the
country.”
Who knew, in the exuberance of 2008, that America was electing an
introvert? And that one who touched so many felt above the
touchy-feely-gritty parts of politics?
Asked last week by Piers Morgan how he got on with Obama, Jimmy Carter —
one of two living Democratic ex-presidents — replied, “We don’t really
have any relationship.” The Clintons have not been courted with dinners
in the private residence either.
Kantor writes that the Obamas, feeling misunderstood, burrowed into
“self-imposed exile” — a “bubble within the bubble” — with their small
circle of Chicago friends, who reinforced the idea that “the American
public just did not appreciate their exceptional leader.”
She reports that Marty Nesbitt indignantly told his fellow Obama pal
Eric Whitaker that the president “could get 70 or 80 percent of the vote
anywhere but the U.S.”
Don't cry for us, America
The truth is we never left you
All through our incompetence
Our mad existence
We'll do better. We promise
All through our incompetence
Our mad existence
We'll do better. We promise
Don't keep your distance
The Obamas, especially Michelle, have radiated the sense that Americans
do not appreciate what they sacrifice by living in a gilded cage.
They’ve forgotten Rule No. 1 of politics: No one sheds tears for anyone
lucky enough to live at the White House. And after four or eight years
of public service, you are assured membership in the 1 percent club.
The Obamas truly feel like victims. But Newt Gingrich, who campaigns by
attacking the culture of victimization, plays one on stage. He soared at
the Charleston CNN debate by brazenly proclaiming himself the victim of
“the elite media protecting Barack Obama” (the same Obama who told Time
he was victimized by the press). Newt’s gambit was a calculated way of
deflecting attention from a charge by his second wife, Marianne, that
the family values he preaches are hypocritical platitudes, given his
cheating ways with two wives he divorced when they were ill.
Could 2012, remarkably, be a race between two powerful victims yearning to be lonely at the top?
No comments:
Post a Comment