He was not opposed to socialism. He called himself an "economic progressive," "economic liberal," and supported socialist programmes such as a cradle-to-grave welfare state. His problem was with Muslim immigrants "burdening" the welfare system. As I have said many times, Europeans "purchased" the children that they never had through immigration to pay for the pension and welfare programmes that they wanted, but couldn't afford. Unfortunately for them, their "children" didn't want to pay for them. Unfortunately for both, too many didn't want the other to become part of their society, which is why there are "No Go" areas in nearly every large city in Europe. Muslims will not go into certain areas and "Natives" (for lack of a better word) will not go into certain other areas.
Interestingly, his manifesto, which was in large part plagiarised from the Unibomber, bore strains of Marx and Engels. Both wrote that Marxism would work best in homogenous societies...so did Lenin, Stalin and Mao for that matter.
"Until its complete extermination or loss of national status, this racial trash always becomes the most fanatical bearer there is of counter-revolution, and it remains that. That is because its entire existence is nothing more than a protest against a great historical revolution. … The next world war will cause not only reactionary classes and dynasties, but also entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the earth. And that too is progress." - Karl Marx, 1849, Neue Rheinische Zeitung
"The chief mission of all other races and peoples, large and small, is to perish in the revolutionary holocaust”. - Karl Marx, Marx People’s Paper, 16 April 1856
All European countries contain ‘left-overs of earlier inhabitants’, now rightly brought into subjugation by more advanced peoples. Amongst such ‘racial trash’ (Voekerabfall) were listed Scottish Highlanders, Bretons, Basques, South Slavs (Slovenes, Croats, Serbs) and Czechs.
From Anders Behring Breivik’s Manifesto (p.1200):
The cultural conservatives guide to reduce pollution:
3. All globalist companies will be NATIONALISED (a minimum of 50,1% ownership must be REDISTRIBUTED to EUROPEAN FEDERATION GOVERNMENTS hands (combined) at any given time, for their respective countries). (Government ownership of the means of production). Investors with majority control who refuse this re-nationalisation process will have their respective corporation expelled from the European Federation monetary zone (losing trading concessions). Ensuring state control is the only way to avoid that globalist capitalist political lobby groups continue to negatively influence European policies relation to immigration and multiculturalism.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BwZX2bK7Uc5dY2ExYzc4YjctMDJlZC00M2QzLTk5NDUtNDhiMDhmMzhkZWQ4&hl=en_US
Yeah, that sounds just like a captain of capitalism to me! Not.
As for his being labeled a "Christian fundamentalist," correct me if I am wrong, but isn't fundamentalism associated with Protestantism? If so, it should be noted that the guy wanted to reform the Reformation so that the "Protestant Labour Church," i.e., Lutheranism, Anglicanism, Baptism, etc., would be abolished and absorbed back into the Catholic Church because the Reformation was "only an excuse to try to destroy the Catholic Church in the first place."
Personally, I think that he has bought into too many Illuminati theories and played too many video games. He is also hung up on Kant, among others.
He's one of the strangest "Christian fundamentalist" and "Tea Party wannabee" cats that I've ever run across: Against abortion, but only because he wants to increase the birthrate. For eugenics. For nationalisation of industry and redistribution of wealth. He also favours state ownership of the means of production and redistribution of the assets of multi-national corporations to combat global warming. For the welfare state. For Judeo-Christian culture, but religion not so much. Loves hookers. Mad at his feminist mummy and sister for making him learn how to knit.
He is not talking about Christianity when he talks about a Christian Europe. He is talking about Western Judeo-Christian CULTURE. He calls himself "moderately" religious, at best. I think that many agnostics and atheists will be surprised to learn that he considers them to be "Christians." As an atheist, I know that I sure as hell was.
See what you can learn when you do your own research and not accept the "truth" from the MSM?
See what you can learn when you do your own research and not accept the "truth" from the MSM?
PS: A word of advice, Americans should be wary about trying to label political parties in Europe. Things aren't always as they seem. In Denmark, which most people believe is a huge, socialist welfare state, the governing party is Venstre, which means "The Left." One would think that this would mean that Venstre was a Socialist, Social Democrat or Progressive party. Actually, it is a party that champions the free market. In the UK, David Cameron is a "conservative," but he would never be considered such in the US. The LibDems are to the right of Labour. I have a hard time seeing many of the Tea Party supporting the current Tories.
No comments:
Post a Comment