Hint: It's not Hillary
BY:
So long have I waited for the glass ceiling to be shattered, for
the barrier to be breached, for the blessed moment to arrive. I had
thought that the day that begins with a woman in the Oval Office, with
more than 50 percent of our population feeling truly represented, was a
day long in coming. I had thought 2008 would be the year we made
history, with Hillary Clinton coming so close to the Democratic
nomination, with Sarah Palin becoming the first woman on the Republican
ticket.
But it was not to be. America reverted to her old habits of sexism
and gynophobia, denying Clinton her place in the sun, even questioning
the maternity of Palin’s youngest child. Barack Obama was elected to the
White House. The contest four years later was, in sheer numbers, a
regression: In 2012 no women were present on any major party ticket.
Obama won his second term.
Only now do I see how mistaken I have been, how shallow my thinking,
how guilty of succumbing to the confines of the hetero-normative
imagination. If Bill Clinton “displays almost every trope of blackness:
single-parent household, born poor, working-class, saxophone playing,
McDonald’s-and-junk-food-loving boy from Arkansas,” and for that reason
could be named by a Nobel laureate as “our first black President,” “blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime”; if Barack Obama “had to come out of a different closet,”
had to learn “to be black the way gays learn to be gay,” if his
“discovery in adulthood of a community not like your own home and the
struggle to belong in both places, without displacement, without
alienation” mirrors “the gay experience,” making him “the first gay president”; and if his positions on Israel make him, in the words of a former employee, “the first Jewish president,”
then our ascription of gender identity need not be based on chromosomes
or sexual characteristics, on hair style or costume, on
self-identification, on arbitrary and socially constructed discourses of
macho and feminine. It is clear to me now that we have had a woman
president since January 20, 2009. Barack Obama’s story is America’s
story. It is our story. It is the female story.
Strong women have surrounded Obama since childhood: his mother, who
raised him after his deadbeat dad fled to Kenya; his grandmother, “who worked her way up from the secretarial pool to become vice president at a local bank”; his magnificent wife and First Lady Michelle Obama, before whom we all bow down;
Michelle’s mother Marian Shields Robinson; the fierce pixie Valerie
Jarrett; his billionaire heiress secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker;
the gaunt and severe and silver-haired Kathleen Sebelius. Obama’s ascent
to power, Sharon Jayson pointed out long ago,
testifies to both the struggles and successes of single moms. From
these ladies and others Obama drew lessons in how to raise his two
beautiful daughters, in the value of women to American society, in the
art of wearing mom jeans.
Throughout his presidency Obama has displayed sensitivity to women’s
issues, women’s concerns, women’s priorities. He appointed two women to
the Supreme Court. He established the game-changing Council on Women and Girls. He signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law. The mascot of his 2012 campaign was a woman.
He is a staunch defender of reproductive rights, supporting
sex-selective and partial-birth abortions, opposing any restrictions on
abortions in the final trimester of pregnancy, calling Sandra Fluke to affirm his support,
demanding the Little Sisters of the Poor provide contraception to their
nun employees. His is a nurturing presidency, emphasizing children’s
nutrition, early childhood education, primary and secondary school
reform, the affordability of higher education, the challenges facing boys and young men of color, universal health care, the high cost of hip replacement for aging parents. He knows that “when women succeed, America succeeds.” And women know he is one of them. In 2012 he won their vote 55 percent to 44 percent.
This is not my opinion: Harvard professor Joseph Nye, citing his colleague Steven Pinker, has noted, “The parts of the world that lag in the decline of violence are also the parts that lag in the empowerment of women.”
In America women are becoming more empowered all the time. What Pinker
teaches, Nye says, is that “women have evolutionary incentives to
maintain peaceful conditions in which to nurture their offspring and
ensure that their genes survive into the next generation.”
Barack Obama shares these incentives. His foreign policy abjures the
stereotypically male, the reflexively violent, the stubbornly
confrontational, and the unthinkingly gruff. He is not afraid to be
called a wimp, not only because using such language is a
micro-aggression, not only because such harmful words depend on
categories and expectations of “male” behavior that are hopelessly
outdated in the twenty-first century, but also because he is better than
that “bored, tough guy shtick.”
Discussion, consultation, negotiation, and open hands are preferable
to violence and clenched fists. Violence is not the answer. If violence
were the answer then Bashar Assad would still be in power (he is), and
would still maintain his chemical weapons (he does). If violence were
the answer then Vladimir Putin would not have left Georgia alone (his
troops occupy it), nor would he have left Ukraine alone (he invaded last
weekend). If the world still operated along antiquated notions of
hegemony and primacy, China would not be disarming (its defense budget is up 12 percent over last year).
Words are more powerful than bombs. Words scared Assad into not using
chemical agents against his own people (he’s gassed them repeatedly).
Words stopped Putin from invading Crimea (the invasion was rapid and
successful). Words convinced China to rescind its Air Defense
Identification Zone in the East China Sea (it’s still there, and the
Chinese are planning another for the South China Sea). Words persuaded
the Iranians to give up their nuclear program (they say they will never
surrender the right to enrich). Words ended construction of Israeli
settlements in the West Bank (construction doubled in 2013), and established peace in the Middle East (Abbas won’t recognize Israel as a Jewish state).
“In terms of stereotypes, various psychological studies show that men
gravitate to the hard power of command,” Joseph Nye wrote in 2012,
“while women are collaborative and intuitively understand the soft power
of attraction and persuasion.” He adds, “Recent leadership studies show
increased success for what was once considered a ‘feminine style.’”
Collaborate, intuitive, soft, attractive, persuasive—these attributes of
the “feminine style” are perfect descriptors of Barack Obama’s relation
to the world, or at least to those parts of the world that are not
Republican or Israeli.
Nye describes the path women must travel to reach power: “Women are
generally not well integrated into male networks that dominate
organizations,” he writes, “and gender stereotypes still hamper women
who try to overcome such barriers.” What he writes about women could
also be written about Obama, who disdains glad-handing and networking,
who “doesn’t really like people,”
who in domestic politics has given up entirely negotiations with the
“male networks that dominate organizations” such as the House of
Representatives, who every day is hampered by the stereotype that he is
brilliant, logical, debonair, pragmatic, witty, world-changing, deeply
read, hip.
Yet Obama has overcome such barriers. He is one of a kind. Knowing
their struggles, sharing their opinions, committed to abortion whenever
and to contraception for all, supportive of equal pay for equal work,
practicing the soft power diplomacy of defense cuts, of negotiations, of
needling, of chiding, delivering geopolitical statements from pre-school classrooms, snapping selfies with the girls at state funerals,
displaying almost every trope of womanhood outlined by the theoretician
of soft power himself, Barack Obama has as much of a claim as the next
girl to being the first woman president. Do not “other” him. Love him.
Celebrate him. Open your mind, as I have. And Hillary: Take note. We
already have a woman in the White House.
1 comment:
who every day is hampered by the stereotype that he is brilliant, logical, debonair, pragmatic, witty, world-changing, deeply read, hip
Er . . . :)
Post a Comment