Fund Your Utopia Without Me.™

19 March 2013

British Speech Nannies and the Respectable Tendency

By Walter Russell Mead

The British media is abuzz this week over the creation of a new government-run press regulator. The NYT reports that the new code invests the regulator with the authority to “order prominent corrections in publications that breach standards,” a power now enshrined in the royal charter, which also sets the rules for the BBC and the Bank of England. British tabloids are not known for the integrity of their content, but many feel that government regulation of it is a bridge too far. 

Via Meadia can’t help but agree. Britain has the makings of a great country, but its governing elite has a disturbing penchant for power grabs. This “Respectable Tendency” in British politics is the country’s curse and ruin. The well-bred establishment backed Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain in the 1930s and ignored Winston Churchill as long as it could. After World War Two this respectable class led moderates in Tory and Labour governments to launch Britain’s ruinous experiments with socialism and state control. Today, the Respectable Tendency is throttling freedom of the press.

Bent British newspaper hacks are indeed a curse. Nobody anywhere in the world thinks Britain’s tabloid press does a good job. But the slimiest, most gin-sodden Fleet Street hack who ever lived isn’t as dangerous to Britain as the bland, responsible, respectable people who decided to set up a government-backed press board.

Britain can thrive in the 21st century, but it will surely fail if the British people allow their brain dead but well groomed establishment free rein.

Related Reading:

The Illiberal, Liberal Left Smashes Liberty In The UK

British Speech Nannies and the Respectable Tendency

For Whom Does The Bell of Freedom Toll?  It Tolls For Thee 

Beware of the New Elites

Will the Press Feel That It Can Ever Rely On Muffin Cameron Again?

Mayor Nutter, The First Amendment, Ant That "National Conversation on Race"

Question Time With Mo: Are Speech Codes Constitutional?

The Speech Police Eats Its Own

No comments: