By Billy Hallowell, 20 January 2012
The
Center for American Progress (CAP), a leftist think tank with close
ties to billionaire George Soros the Obama administration, is under fire
for alleged anti-Semitism. A number of Jewish organizations are in a
back-and-forth with the group, as critics claim that CAP staff members
have a history of using anti-Israel language.
The Washington Post has more regarding what, exactly, sparked these groups’ concerns:
Among the points of
contention are Twitter posts by one CAP writer on his personal account
referring to “Israel-firsters.” Some experts say the phrase has roots in the
anti-Semitic charge that American Jews are more loyal to a foreign country,
Israel, than to the United States. In another case, a staffer described a U.S.
senator as showing more fealty to the prime U.S. pro-Israel lobby, the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, than to his own constituents. The first writer
has since left the staff.
But the critics also point
to writings on the CAP Web site, where staffers have suggested that AIPAC was
pushing the United States toward war with Iran and likened Israel’s treatment
of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip to the policies of the segregated American
South.
The author of the “Israel-firster” tweets was Zaid Jilani, who is described as a “Senior Reporter/Blogger for ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.” Jilani has reportedly left the organization in recent days to accept a new job outside of CAP.
According
to the Jerusalem Post, the group’s Middle East Progress Director Matt
Duss, wrote back in 2010 that “the entire Israeli occupation” of the
Gaza Strip is “a moral abomination.“ He compared this ”abomination” to
the Jim Crow South in the United States. He wrote:
Greater international
attention and sympathy to the plight of Palestinians suffering under the
Israeli-Egyptian- (and U.S.) enforced siege of Hamas-ruled Gaza is precisely
what Israeli authorities were hoping to avoid. [...]
Like segregation in the
American South, the siege of Gaza (and the entire Israeli occupation, for that
matter) is a moral abomination that should be intolerable to anyone claiming
progressive values. It’s sad that it should require the deaths of
non-Palestinians to finally shake the international community from apathy and
inaction, but, as with the tragic murders of Goodman, Chaney, and
Schwerner, if it contributes to ending
the situation then that’s a positive outcome.
In August, there was also a ThinkProgress post by Eli Clifton entitled, “AIPAC’s Iran Strategy On Sanctions Mirrors Run-Up To Iraq War Tactics” that drew concern. The post concluded, “It would appear that AIPAC is now using the same escalating measures against Iran that were used before the invasion of Iraq.” While critics reacted, CAP responded, via an update on the same post, saying, “we are not reporting on whether AIPAC lobbied for the Iraq war.”
As
CAP has worked to temper criticism, some alleged internal discussion
and new social media policy at the think tank seem to indicate a
recognition that these statements and comments are, indeed,
problematic. The Jerusalem Post reports:
The Jerusalem Post
exclusively obtained an e-mail in January in which [Faiz Shakir,
editor-in-chief of ThinkProgress] described Jilani’s words charging
supporters of Israel with dual-loyalty as “terrible anti-Semitic language.”
As a result of the alleged
Judeophobia at CAP, the Jerusalem Post has learned from a Democratic Party
source that CAP has introduced a new social media policy to monitor and prevent
prejudicial writings. CAP declined to confirm the existence of the new policy.
Alana Goodman, the assistant online editor of Commentary, wrote an article in the New York Post on Thursday that claims Shakir met for coffee with Obama just six days after CAP was accused of anti-Semitism. This, at the least, seems to corroborate the close-knit nature that exists between the think tank and the administration.
At a time when President Obama is working diligently to court the
Jewish vote and following questions over how strongly the administration
truly supports Israel, these developments are troubling.
Last week, Jarrod Bernstein, the White House liaison with the Jewish
community, met with Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the associate dean of the
Simon Wiesenthal Center, to discuss worries over CAP’s perceived
anti-Israeli sentiment (the Center has said that the CAP writers “are guilty of dangerous political libels resonating with historic and toxic anti-Jewish prejudices.”).
During their discussion, Bernstein apparently called the situation “troubling” and, according to the Post, said “that
[the attitude toward Israel at the think tank] is not this
administration.” Cooper dubbed the language “corrosive and
unacceptable.”
The Anti-Defamation League chimed in as well, with national director
Abraham Foxman calling statements from some CAP staffers “anti-Semitic
and borderline anti-Semitic.”
We have a zero-tolerance policy on anti-Semitism. We have written critically about its continuing use in contemporary political debates, and we take any allegation of anti-Semitism extremely seriously. A very small number of tweets on the personal accounts of ThinkProgress staff were inappropriate, and the authors have publicly apologized for using objectionable language. That language never appeared in any CAP or ThinkProgress publication, and we have taken steps to ensure that all CAP staff maintain the highest standards in their communications even in their personal social media accounts.
While some CAP supporters agree with this defense and claiming that CAP has always been mainstream and pro-Israel, critics aren’t satisfied. Considering the group’s close relations with the Obama administration, this controversy isn’t likely to simmer in the immediate.
It’s important to note the strong ties that CAP has to Soros as well. According to the philanthropist’s web site,
“George Soros was an initial donor to the Center for American Progress
and he continues to support the organization through the Open Society
Foundations.” He has given millions of dollars to both create and
sustain the liberal think tank. We have reported on Soros’ contributions to the liberal Jewish group J Street in the past as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment