Fund Your Utopia Without Me.™

18 August 2013

How Photographs Of Markets Revealed The Grimness Of Soviet Life (Photo Essay)




 http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40983000/jpg/_40983640_food_shelves_ap203.jpg
 
http://www.rymaszewski.iinet.net.au/images/shop1.jpg

http://www.synthstuff.com/mt/archives/01/2011/USSR_empty-shelves-long-lines.jpg


http://www.viceland.com/bg/v1n10/htdocs/mhoro-101/3.jpg

Russian incompetence in managing supplies


 

 
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/01/article-2255693-16B57ABA000005DC-990_964x647.jpg

http://cs9233.vk.me/v9233130/c2/jmBS2OQ9k0Y.jpg



From Real Russia...






The elders often tell their children about their Soviet youth. They listen with delight about the “supermarkets” of the USSR, kinds of goods one could and could not buy, about their schoolyears so different from those of today. Let us remember more details… 

Soviet groceries were so much unlike those we do shopping at today. Nowadays we fill shopping carts with various stuff in colorful packing, put bags with this stuff in cars and rush back home. If anyone could have seen us with such bags in the USSR, he would have probably considered us to be millionaires.

Supermarkets were called 'Universam' stores and that means 'Universal stores.'

Typical Soviet 'Universam':


http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/small/9541746.jpg


The Bakery...




There were wooden or metal bread stands with a tied metal spoon for testing bread’s freshness.





Dairy products were usually sold in glass bottles transported in such metal boxes. When a car with milk was coming up, the rattle of these boxes was heard from far away.


Fish...

Fish stores often sold a lot of preserved fish and the intense herring smell could assault you down the street.



 It was 'chic' to open a can of Baltic sprats canned with oil for the New Year celebration.




Famous sign 'Vegetables-Fruits.'



There was also a 'special' smell inside these stores – the smell of sour cabbage, beetroots, carrots, and cucumbers.




There were also innumerable glass jars. Instead of Tetra Paks, one could buy 3-liter jars with tomato, apple, pear or birch juice.




Mineral waters...




Wine...


 
The stores presented a rather miserable spectacle inside. In the picture below you may see a sales area of an ordinary Soviet 'supermarket.'  The checkout counters look a bit like modern ones, but back then one couldn’t even buy some bubble gum there.

 
In a meat section meat lay on metal trays that’s why there was always a rattle when taking away and putting them back.


 
Meat and sausage departments could boast of very advanced equipment – wooden boards, knives and scales with weights. No slicers, electronic scales, shrink-wrap or a packing person.



Sausages were sliced into 200-300 gr pieces. One was allowed to buy only one piece. To buy more people had to take their children or relatives with them.



Line by the store is waiting for opening to get inside first hoping to buy some hard-to-get goods, above and below...
 



Today, standing in a supermarket line of three, we begin to express our indignation because not all checkout counters are working. Soviet people were used to stay in longer lines, it was an everyday occurrence.



 While parents stood in lines, children went to schools.

The distinctive feature of Soviet schools was a school uniform that is practically no longer used in modern Russia. It was usually of two colours: brown and blue.

 

Girls could choose between these two colours as well.


 
Girls uniform of that time is popular nowadays only among high school graduates, who wear them on the last day at school. 



Emblems kids used to wear on the sleeves of their uniforms.



 Everyone was a member of Communist Union of Youth or a Pioneer and wore such badges on the lapels.



 And, of course, Pioneers wore a red pioneer tie, the main must-have item. If the tie was tied incorrectly, a teacher had to reprimand.



'Happy Pioneer’s Day!'





Poverty, Prostitutes And The Long, Slow Death Of The Soviet Union: Haunting Pictures Show Desperate Struggle To Survive In Last Days Of USSR



By Daily Mail Reporter

These shocking pictures may look like something out of the Great Depression - but in fact they show life in the last years of the Soviet Union, less than three decades ago.

Shop shelves were often bare, it was normal to have to join a long queue if you wanted to buy groceries and many of the people looked ground down after a century of desperate poverty.

The dismal state of the USSR's economy, during a time of rapidly improving living standards in the West, was a result of its dogmatic Communist political system, which stifled free enterprise and stopped the country moving on from its feudal past.

As these images show, by the 1980s that system was close to collapse, as Mikhail Gorbachev's liberalising reforms did little more than open the door to ever louder clamours for change - and on Boxing Day 1991, just a few years after these photos were taken, the Soviet Union was finally dissolved.


Hard times: Eighteen-year-old prostitute Katya scours the street for work as a police car drives past in Moscow in 1991 shortly before the collapse of the USSR

Hard times: Eighteen-year-old prostitute Katya scours the street for work as a police car drives past in Moscow in 1991 shortly before the collapse of the USSR


Hindered by centralised market forces: A long queue forms in Novokuznetsk for bacon and other meat from the butcher at a state-run market

Hindered by centralised market forces: A long queue forms in Novokuznetsk for bacon and other meat from the butcher at a state-run market


Glum: Two dirty children look out the window in a coal-mining and steel-manufacturing community in Siberia enduring widespread economic hardships

Glum: Two dirty children look out the window in a coal-mining and steel-manufacturing community in Siberia enduring widespread economic hardships


Struggling: Siberian women sit outside houses in the coal-mining and steel-manufacturing community of Novokuznetsk

Struggling: Siberian women sit outside houses in the coal-mining and steel-manufacturing community of Novokuznetsk


Bleak: Russians must wait in food lines to get whatever goods are available in November 1991, just a month before the collapse of the USSR

Bleak: Russians must wait in food lines to get whatever goods are available in November 1991, just a month before the collapse of the USSR


A real age of austerity: Shoppers line up at the check out stand of a store in Moscow in 1991 as the USSR neared collapse

A real age of austerity: Shoppers line up at the check out stand of a store in Moscow in 1991 as the USSR neared collapse


Looks more like the 1970s: Women patients sit at a table with food and fold their laundry in a rundown hospital ward in Moscow in July 1991

Looks more like the 1970s: Women patients sit at a table with food and fold their laundry in a rundown hospital ward in Moscow in July 1991


Taking a breather: Hospital nurse Ludmilla Subocheva smokes on her break in the dining room

Taking a breather: Hospital nurse Ludmilla Subocheva smokes on her break in the dining room


Unrest: Soldiers and tanks moved to Red Square to surround the Kremlin at the beginning of the coup. But by the end, much of the military decided to back Gorbachev

Unrest: Soldiers and tanks moved to Red Square to surround the Kremlin at the beginning of the coup. But by the end, much of the military decided to back Gorbachev


People Standing in bread line

Grim: A line forms for bread in Moscow (above), while woman mourns the three victims of the attempted coup at various impromptu memorials around the city in 1991

People gather to mourn the three victims of the attempted coup at various impromptu memorials around Moscow in 1991

Sombre: Three female Moscow department store workers watch a mass funeral from the store window following the failed coup attempt

Sombre: Three female Moscow department store workers watch a mass funeral from the store window following the failed coup attempt


Small comfort: Women stand next to several vodka bottles which they are exchanging for small change at a recycling point

Small comfort: Women stand next to several vodka bottles which they are exchanging for small change at a recycling point


Taking their minds off things: Siberian men relax outside a shack in the town of Novokuznetsk, which was hit hard by widespread economic problems in the early 90s

Taking their minds off things: Siberian men relax outside a shack in the town of Novokuznetsk, which was hit hard by widespread economic problems in the early 90s


No smiles: Female miners take a break from their work in the town of Novokuznetsk, Russia, in June 1991

No smiles: Female miners take a break from their work in the town of Novokuznetsk, Russia, in June 1991


Getting the bare essentials: Shoppers and vendors in a food market in Kaluga in November 1991

Getting the bare essentials: Shoppers and vendors in a food market in Kaluga in November 1991


Signs of desperation: People stand in line with cans for food supplies in Tula, Russia, in November 1991

Signs of desperation: People stand in line with cans for food supplies in Tula, Russia, in November 1991


Hoping for anything: Russians must wait in food lines to get whatever goods are available in Moscow

Hoping for anything: Russians must wait in food lines to get whatever goods are available in Moscow


Putting on a brave face: A woman stands near the back of a queue for a market in the Russian capital

Putting on a brave face: A woman stands near the back of a queue for a market in the Russian capital


Dark times: A coal miner who lives in an industrial community in Siberia enduring widespread economic hardships in June 1991

Dark times: A coal miner who lives in an industrial community in Siberia enduring widespread economic hardships in June 1991


Getting by: A woman plays her accordion along Arbat Street in Moscow, a popular pedestrian thoroughfare, as several men stand nearby watching her

Getting by: A woman plays her accordion along Arbat Street in Moscow, a popular pedestrian thoroughfare, as several men stand nearby watching her


A young girl plays her violin for a crowd on Moscow's Arbat Street with her dog lounging in the violin case

A young girl plays her violin for a crowd with her dog lounging in the violin case (above) and an accordionist (below) performs on Arbat Street in Moscow

An accordionist performs on Arbat Street, a popular pedestrian thoroughfare





Wrap Your Baby in Old Newspapers — the 70 Years of 'A Deficit of Everything'



 The Real USSR:




One of the main criticisms of the Soviet Union now, from an everyday perspective, was the huge deficit of everything. The planned economy failed to supply a constant flow of goods necessary for the well-being of people. It was not the matter of incapacity — no, the means certainly allowed the building of space shuttles or create extra strong tanks.  The shortage for goods was created artificially — due to the reasons of the strange Soviet ideology.


 
A shop in Vladi­vos­tok, The sign on the wall: Juices. Water. Ice Cream. The photo is by Vladimir Kobzar.




According to the Soviet census of 1977 — cited from the Grand Soviet Encyclopaedia — volume 24, part 2, data on the house hold items of prolonged usage (that is, TV sets, fridges, washing machines) - the times of Brezhnev were far from abundant. For instance, in 1975 only 74 out of 100 households owned a TV — which means that 26% of all families would not have one!  Furthermore, these TVs would have to be black and white, as colour TVs did not widely appear in the USSR until very late eighties. In the mid-1970s an average American family had a 1.5 TV sets per house — and they were certainly colour.




Come here, honey, Brezh­nev is on now!



In the mid to late 1980s the situation with TVs had straight­ened out — but doesn’t it seem ridiculous that in 1975, the year of Soyuz Apollo space docking project, every fourth family in the USSR did not have a telly! Now it seems like the government had to make a choice — either every house gets a TV  — or we explore outer space. The suc­cess of the Americans in both of these mis­sions was frowned upon.

It could be under­stood if this applied to some high tech for those times gadgets — but no, this was the everyday necessities. Say, the very first range of video cassette play­ers and recorders was released by Sony in 1969. If we were to say that an average Russian person did not even hear about the VCRs till late 1980s — we would not be exaggerating. More­over, a regular household was only able to purchase one in the early 1990s. But this applied to almost everything, from fridges to radio transmitters — only 61% of fam­i­lies owed a fridge in 1975. How was it possible that the space exploration programmes were costing the country a formidable chunk of the budget — yet very little money was spent on supplying regular people with the necessities? The data on washing machines is similar: about 40% of all households had to do their washing by hand.

The same was with almost all house­hold goods — the noto­ri­ous exam­ple here is baby nap­pies. The dis­pos­able nap­pies were invented in 1958, and three years later they became a necessity for every baby born in the West. If you were born around that time and you are read­ing this here now, you would be very likely to think the sit­u­a­tion was no dif­fer­ent all over the world, except per­haps some Africa bits. Alas — the USSR saw no nap­pies  - not till very late 80s, and when they appeared, they cost a small for­tune. To wrap babies in old news­pa­pers was not unheard of.

This nappy phe­nom­e­non was idiosyncratic for the USSR, and no log­i­cal expla­na­tion has ever been offered. More­over, the goods of pro­longed usage had really proved to be of this kind: as no replace­ment was avail­able, TVs and fridges were in use for decades, often despite the tech­no­log­i­cal progress. Also, to buy a fridge or a TV one had to fill a request which could take months to come through.

This total deficit of every­thing cre­ated an agi­tated demand for things on the black mar­ket. As shops were barely filled, the sav­ings of an aver­age per­son mounted, and much of it would have been dis­pos­able. Of course, a TV cost three or four aver­age monthly salaries, but often there was noth­ing to spend the money on — at all.



 
One item check out




The Soviet dream was meant to be in full throt­tle, accord­ing to the movies and other means of pro­pa­ganda. Yet the huge gap between the real­ity and the offi­cial ver­sion was one of the most debil­i­tat­ing fea­tures of life back in the Soviet Union.





My Pilgrimage To The Motherland:  Despite what I had always heard about the bare shelves the supermarket in Kiev was mega-they had everything, from cheeses to prepared foods. I was amazed and told my friends that when I learned about Ukraine they told us that people waited in line for hours for bread, butter and cheese and the store shelves were empty – they said under communism that is how it was but with capitalism they have everything.




http://tinyurl.com/lhgnr7p



Senator Mary Landrieu Is Clueless



http://revolution-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BDTXx3YCAAA3bVG.jpglarge.jpeg

Unionised medical workers hold banners reading, 'No financial cuts' and 'Public health care system' as they shout slogans during a demonstration against budget cuts and plans to part-privatise bits of their 'cherished' national health service in Madrid, Spain, 9 December 2012.







'It’s embarrassing to me to go to places like France and Spain ... and their workers all manage to have health insurance that can’t be taken away.'

- Senator Mary Landrieu



Mary 'South Dakota is a border state' Landrieu is an idiot and, evidently, she hasn’t been to Spain lately...


Like ‘JustTheFacts,’ Senator Landrieu seems to believe that health insurance = healthcare. It doesn’t. It never has.  It never will.

Period.

Story.

End of.

Ask the Spanish. They might have health insurance, but, with the cuts made because they lived on borrowed money for years and outspent their earnings, that insurance only covers that which the State allows...and such has been diminishing.

It’s like having a gift certificate at an old Soviet Universam store. One could only use it to acquire the meager items available…when, and if, the shelves weren’t bare.


Fatima Branas, a spokeswoman for organizers, said privatization plans were short-sighted because they did not take into account that savings could be made without selling off services.

"What their plans really mean is a total change of our health care model and a dismantling of the system used," she said.

Madrid's government, under regional president Ignacio Gonzalez, maintains cuts are needed to secure health services during a deep recession.

Health care and education are administered by Spain's 17 semi-autonomous regions, rather than the central government, and each sets its own budgets and spending plans. Regions account for almost 40 percent of public spending. The Madrid region is governed by the Popular Party, the center-right alignment also in power centrally under Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy.

Many regions are struggling as Spain's economy contracts into a double-dip recession triggered by a real estate crash in 2008.

Some, having overspent and being unable to borrow on financial markets to repay their huge debts, are cutting budgets.
 

Co-pays had already been introduced and the protests did not stop regions from beginning to privatise part of their healthcare systems.

Furthermore, she obviously doesn't know the state of the French system either...



When Laure Cuccarolo went into early labor on a recent Sunday night in a village in southern France, her only choice was to ask the local fire brigade to whisk her to a hospital 30 miles away. A closer one had been shuttered by cost cuts in France’s universal health system.

Ms. Cuccarolo’s little girl was born in a firetruck.

France claims it long ago achieved much of what today’s U.S. health-care overhaul is seeking: It covers everyone, and provides what supporters say is high-quality care. But soaring costs are pushing the system into crisis. The result: As Congress fights over whether America should be more like France, the French government is trying to borrow U.S. tactics.

In recent months, France imposed American-style “co-pays” on patients to try to throttle back prescription-drug costs and forced state hospitals to crack down on expenses.…

And service cuts — such as the closure of a maternity ward near Ms. Cuccarolo’s home — are prompting complaints from patients, doctors and nurses that care is being rationed. That concern echos worries among some Americans that the U.S. changes could lead to rationing.

The French system’s fragile solvency shows how tough it is to provide universal coverage while controlling costs, the professed twin goals of President Barack Obama’s [overhaul].

French taxpayers fund a state health insurer, Assurance Maladie, proportionally to their income, and patients get treatment even if they can’t pay for it. France spends 11% of national output on health services, compared with 17% in the U.S., and routinely outranks the U.S. in infant mortality and some other health measures.

The problem is that Assurance Maladie has been in the red since 1989. This year the annual shortfall is expected to reach €9.4 billion ($13.5 billion), and €15 billion in 2010, or roughly 10% of its budget.


Landrieu has voted for Obamacare, stimulus, and gun control, among other items on the Obama agenda. She seems remarkably out of step with her constituents. 

Maybe, she should be embarrassed to go to Spain because it has a 25% unemployment rate (youth unemployment is at 57%). In France, unemployment is 11% and predicted to continue to rise (youth unemployment in 37%).  Louisiana’s unemployment rate was 6.8% in May.




http://tinyurl.com/m7q48bq



MoDo: The Clintons Love Their Money...And Want More, More, More!





Why is it that America’s roil family always seems better in abstract than in concrete? The closer it gets to running the world once more, the more you are reminded of all the things that bugged you the last time around.

The Clintons’ neediness, their sense of what they are owed in material terms for their public service, their assumption that they’re entitled to everyone’s money.

Are we about to put the “For Rent” sign back on the Lincoln Bedroom?

If Americans are worried about money in politics, there is no larger concern than the Clintons, who are cosseted in a world where rich people endlessly scratch the backs of rich people.

They have a Wile E. Coyote problem; something is always blowing up. Just when the Clintons are supposed to be floating above it all, on a dignified cloud of do-gooding leading into 2016, pop-pop-pop, little explosions go off everywhere, reminding us of the troubling connections and values they drag around.

There’s the continuing grotesque spectacle of Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin. And there’s the sketchy involvement of the Clintons’ most prolific fund-raiser, Terry McAuliffe, and Hillary’s brother Tony Rodham in a venture, GreenTech Automotive; it’s under federal investigation and causing fireworks in Virginia, where McAuliffe is running for governor.

Many Israelis were disgusted to learn that Bill Clinton was originally scheduled to scarf up $500,000 to speak at the Israeli president Shimon Peres’s 90th birthday festivities in June. I guess being good friends with Peres and brokering the accord that won Peres the Nobel Peace Prize were not reasons enough for Bill to celebrate. The Israeli branch of the Jewish National Fund had agreed to donate half a mil to the Clinton foundation. Isn’t the J.N.F. “supposed to plant trees with donor cash?” Haaretz chided before the fund pulled back. “I guess money does grow on trees.”

I never thought I’d have to read the words Ira Magaziner again. But the man who helped Hillary torpedo her own health care plan is back.

In a Times article last week headlined “Unease at Clinton Foundation Over Finances and Ambitions,” Nicholas Confessore and Amy Chozick offered a compelling chronicle about an internal review of the rechristened Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation that illuminated the fungible finances and tensions between Clinton loyalists and the foundation architects Magaziner and Doug Band, former bag carrier for President Clinton.

You never hear about problems with Jimmy Carter’s foundation; he just quietly goes around the world eradicating Guinea worm disease. But Magaziner continues to be a Gyro Gearloose, the inept inventor of Donald Duck’s Duckburg.

“On one occasion, Mr. Magaziner dispatched a team of employees to fly around the world for months gathering ideas for a climate change proposal that never got off the ground,” Confessore and Chozick said.

We are supposed to believe that every dollar given to a Clinton is a dollar that improves the world. But is it? Clintonworld is a galaxy where personal enrichment and political advancement blend seamlessly, and where a cast of jarringly familiar characters pad their pockets every which way to Sunday.

“Efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future,” Confessore and Chozick wrote.

The most egregious nest of conflicts was a firm founded by Doug Band called Teneo, a scammy blend of corporate consulting, public relations and merchant banking. Band, a surrogate son to Bill, put Huma, a surrogate daughter to Hillary, on the payroll. Even Big Daddy Bill was a paid adviser.

As The Times reported, Teneo worked on retainer, charging monthly fees up to $250,000 and recruiting clients from among Clinton Foundation donors, while encouraging others to become foundation donors. The Clintons distanced themselves from Teneo when they got scorched with bad publicity after the collapse of its client MF Global, the international brokerage firm led by the former New Jersey governor Jon Corzine.

And Chelsea is now shaping the foundation’s future, and her political future. So there may not be as much oxygen for her troublesome surrogate siblings.

As George Packer wrote in The New Yorker, Bill Clinton earned $17 million last year giving speeches, including one to a Lagos company for $700,000. Hillary gets $200,000 a speech.

Until Harry Truman wrote his memoirs, the ex-president struggled on an Army pension of $112.56 a month. “I could never lend myself to any transaction, however respectable,” he said, “that would commercialize on the prestige and dignity of the office of the presidency.”

So quaint, Packer wrote, observing, “The top of American life has become a very cozy and lucrative place, where the social capital of who you are and who you know brings unimaginable returns.”

The Clintons want to do big worthy things, but they also want to squeeze money from rich people wherever they live on planet Earth, insatiably gobbling up cash for politics and charity and themselves from the same incestuous swirl.