I know that many, especially on the Left, will deny that such could possibly be happening in a Western country in the 21st century, but it is. I also know that there is a virulent strain of anti-Semitism on the Left – Save it. You can attempt to deny it, but I can prove it. A word of advice to my friends on the Left, the enemy of your enemy is not your friend. You might believe that making common cause with Islamists now will lead to your victory in the overthrow of capitalism and your installation of a Socialist welfare state and you may be right, but in the end, you will lose. There are more Islamists than there are of you. The Islamists are more vicious than you. They are also much worse than anything you imagine of the Right and about capitalism. Let’s just take one simple issue: Homosexuality.
The leftist Norwegian Labour government’s Ministry of Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion named Mahdi Hassan, a noted homophobe, as the 2009 Role Model of the Year. He looks like a very nice chap. Of course, Mein Kampf probably looked like a good book in Germany in the 1920s judging by the cover.
 |
Bilde av prisvinner Mahdi Hassan og barne- og likestillingsminister Anniken Huitfeldt.
Hassan told the newspaper Arbeidets Rett that he wants a ban on homosexuality, based on the Qur'an. Does he support the death penalty for gays? That's "up to each individual country to decide, but, in general, yes."
Was he condemned? Needless to say, the homosexual community wasn’t thrilled, but other than that he was cheered with the Socialists applauding loudly.
"The struggle which is now beginning between the Zionist and Bolshevik Jews is little less than a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people.”- Winston Churchill
“There is freedom of speech in Norway and in the Tynset Socialist Left Party we consider it unproblematic that Mahdi is opposed in principle to homosexuality. It is in accordance with his religion," said Stein Petter Løkken, leader of the Socialist Left Party in Hassan's home kommune of Tynset. Stein, Stalin had a name for you, “Useful Idiot.” You wear the dunce cap well.
In November 2007 during an Oslo debate, at which the deputy chairman of Norway’s Islamic Council, Asghar Ali, was asked if he would refuse to reject the death penalty for gays. He refused. The head of the Islamic Council, which represents 80,000 Muslims), Senaid Kobilica was asked where he stood on the question, he responded that he couldn’t possibly give a definitive answer “until he got a ruling from the European Fatwa Council, but that homosexuality was against the teachings of the Qur’an and execution is the proscribed punishment.” If it makes you feel any better, Kobilica did say that he was “100 per cent certain that the Council will not come out in favour of something which conflicts with European law.” By which he means, that while the death penalty for homosexuals is, indeed, an orthodox Islamic position — one about which the Fatwa Council’s head, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, has himself written sympathetically — Western Muslim leaders, in accordance with the Koran, prefer in such controversial cases not to challenge infidel law…for now.
"It isn’t possible to live homosexually and at the same time say that one practices Islam. These are two incompatible things… Homosexuality goes against what Islam stands for, and therefore it can’t be combined." - Senaid Kobilica
After the brouhaha in 2007, it emerged that Asghar Ali not only was deputy chairman of the Islamic Council, but was also on the board of the Oslo Arbeidersamfunn, the largest and most influential association within Norway’s ruling Labour Party. As Bruce Bawer reported, when asked about Ali’s views, the head of the Oslo Arbeidersamfunn, Anne Cathrine Berger, lamented that some people “can’t see the difference between a board member’s views and the organisation’s views.” Despite scattered calls for his dismissal, Ali remained on the board.
Recently, a gay couple was attacked for holding hands; they were told that gays were not welcome because the area in which they were walking in was "Muslim territory." On another occasion, a gay couple was ejected from a kebab restaurant because they were kissing. These as well as other incidents led to a debate in the major newspapers about the existence of morality police, who strove to obtain social control based on Islamic values in multi-ethnic communities.
Kaltham Lie, who was tortured for his sexual orientation by Saddam Hussein and fled Iraq for Norway in 1992, says that it was too difficult to go to the mosque. As Norway’s first openly gay Muslim, he now stays away from the Muslim community, especially in Oslo. "It's very important for me to be open and not to try to hide. Somebody must stand up for the world to advance. "Oslo can be difficult, but we he also a lot of positive things, even in Grønland."
He attends a Christian church with his new husband, Knut Asprusten. “[H]e was with me in church. Even if we have different religions, we both believe in an open God. It doesn't cause us any problems,” said Asprusten.
In a country of 5 million people, where only 3% of the population is Muslim, there is only one openly Muslim lesbian: Sara Azmeh Rasmussen.
Update on Norway: The Poison of Multiculturalism If you want a pretty good example of just why multiculturalism is so poisonous, here’s one for you.
I live in Norway. Here, as elsewhere in Europe, there reside
innumerable immigrants from the Muslim world who despise Western values,
reject sexual equality, and affirm primitive patriarchal codes and
concepts of “honor” that condemn people (mostly females) to death for
infractions that neither you nor I would even recognize as infractions.
Nonetheless these individuals enjoy Norwegian residency, and in some
cases Norwegian citizenship, which some of them were granted because
they claimed asylum (most likely on specious grounds, as demonstrated by
the fact that many, if not most, of them return regularly to the
countries from which they supposedly “fled”), and which others were
granted because they married Norwegian residents (usually their own
cousins, whom they married for no other reason than to acquire Western
residency).
Every now and then there come along people from the Muslim world who are legitimate asylum-seekers – people who really would be
in danger if they returned to their homelands, people to whom Western
countries should feel a moral obligation to grant residency, and people
from whose presence those countries would actually benefit, precisely
because they’re people who will appreciate freedom more than most of the
rest of us do. To put it another way, they’re the kind of immigrants
who, generation by generation, have renewed the American spirit and the
American dream by reminding those of us whose ancestors preceded them
just how precious a thing freedom is.
Meet “Azad.” He’s a gay Iraqi who, according to an article
at the website of NRK, the Norwegian national broadcasting system, has
been in a committed relationship since 2006 with somebody named Odd Arne
Henriksen. (I don’t know either of these guys, though my partner,
after looking at the picture of the two of them that accompanies the
article, says he’s seen Henriksen around town a number of times. Oslo is
a pretty small city.)
For years, apparently, “Azad” has lived in Norway without causing
any problems or being a burden on the state. But now an appellate court
has ordered that he be deported to Iraq. If he goes back there, he
says, “my clan will kill me.” Indeed, the court recognizes that if it
becomes known in Iraq that “Azad” is gay, he risks “exclusion,
isolation, and physical punishment.” (In fact, he risks much worse.)
Nonetheless the court has ruled that “Azad,” in the words of NRK’s
report, “must comply with his homeland’s sociocultural norms.”
Let me repeat that: he “must comply with his homeland’s sociocultural norms.”
Forget freedom. Forget Norway’s sociocultural norms.
Forget the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In making a decision
that for “Azad” may mean the difference between life and death, what
matters to an appellate court in Norway – a Western European country, a
member of NATO – is “his homeland’s sociocultural norms”…however brutal
and primitive those “norms” may be. NRK notes that “Azad” is far from
alone. In the past two years, Norway has turned down no fewer than
forty of fifty-two gay asylum seekers. The records of many other
Western countries are not much better.
In the case of Norway, however, such statistics are especially
outrageous. For this is a country that likes to think of itself as
being extremely gay-friendly. It was the second country in the world to
recognize same-sex partnerships. It was the sixth to recognize gay
marriages. When it comes to native Norwegians who happen to be gay, the
Norwegian state is very clear about where it stands on the rights and
dignity of gay people. Gay Norwegians deserve no less than every right
granted straight Norwegians, up to and including the right to marry.
But when it comes to a person like “Azad,” a person from a country
where he may well be imprisoned and even executed for being gay, all
bets are off. For in such cases the Norwegian state’s respect for
individuals takes a back seat – in a big way – to its respect for
“different cultures.” A gay person who happens to have been born into an
Islamic culture cannot expect from the Norwegian state any deliverance
from his culture’s values, even if those values condemn him to death.
The situation is actually even worse than I have already made it
sound. Consider this: one of the five million residents of Norway is an
Iraqi-born man named Mullah Krekar,
who founded the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam. He is a brutal monster
who has spoken out in support of Osama bin Laden and the actions of
9/11 and who is known to have ordered the torture of children. He came
to Norway many years ago as an asylum seeker and was granted asylum. He
now lives in Oslo, where he has a comfortable apartment, receives a
generous subsidy from the government, and is able to move around the
city freely without supervision. He lives with his wife, who works in a
day-care center, and his children, who are being given as good an
education as Norway can provide. There have been efforts to return him
to Iraq to face justice for his manifold crimes. Yet Norwegian
authorities have repeatedly refused to send him back on the grounds that
he might be imprisoned or otherwise punished.In other words, Norwegian authorities are able to defend – are,
indeed, zealous about defending – what they see as the individual
“rights” and “dignity” of a terrorist, so long as those “rights” and
“dignity” don’t appear to conflict with any cultural “norms” or “values”
that they’re afraid of offending. But when it comes to “Azad”? Well,
sorry, fella – this way to the plane.
About Bruce Bawer:Back
Continue in Part XVII.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment