Fund Your Utopia Without Me.™

25 July 2011

Anders Behring Breivik: Anti-Socialist? Not So Fast.

Anders Behring Breivik wrote about ridding Europe of cultural Marxism and Islamists and wanted Europe to be more like Japan or South Korea with Socialist programmes, but nationalist and homogenous ... "because they are "scientifically advanced, economically progressive" societies "which will not accept multiculturalism or Cultural Marxist principles.”

He was not opposed to socialism. He called himself an "economic progressive," "economic liberal," and supported socialist programmes such as a cradle-to-grave welfare state. His problem was with Muslim immigrants "burdening" the welfare system. As I have said many times, Europeans "purchased" the children that they never had through immigration to pay for the pension and welfare programmes that they wanted, but couldn't afford. Unfortunately for them, their "children" didn't want to pay for them. Unfortunately for both, too many didn't want the other to become part of their society, which is why there are "No Go" areas in nearly every large city in Europe. Muslims will not go into certain areas and "Natives" (for lack of a better word) will not go into certain other areas.

Interestingly, his manifesto, which was in large part plagiarised from the Unibomber, bore strains of Marx and Engels. Both wrote that Marxism would work best in homogenous societies...so did Lenin, Stalin and Mao for that matter.

"Until its complete extermination or loss of national status, this racial trash always becomes the most fanatical bearer there is of counter-revolution, and it remains that. That is because its entire existence is nothing more than a protest against a great historical revolution. … The next world war will cause not only reactionary classes and dynasties, but also entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the earth. And that too is progress." - Karl Marx, 1849, Neue Rheinische Zeitung

"The chief mission of all other races and peoples, large and small, is to perish in the revolutionary holocaust”. - Karl Marx, Marx People’s Paper, 16 April 1856

All European countries contain ‘left-overs of earlier inhabitants’, now rightly brought into subjugation by more advanced peoples. Amongst such ‘racial trash’ (Voekerabfall) were listed Scottish Highlanders, Bretons, Basques, South Slavs (Slovenes, Croats, Serbs) and Czechs.

From Anders Behring Breivik’s Manifesto (p.1200):

The cultural conservatives guide to reduce pollution:

3. All globalist companies will be NATIONALISED (a minimum of 50,1% ownership must be REDISTRIBUTED to EUROPEAN FEDERATION GOVERNMENTS hands (combined) at any given time, for their respective countries). (Government ownership of the means of production). Investors with majority control who refuse this re-nationalisation process will have their respective corporation expelled from the European Federation monetary zone (losing trading concessions). Ensuring state control is the only way to avoid that globalist capitalist political lobby groups continue to negatively influence European policies relation to immigration and multiculturalism.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BwZX2bK7Uc5dY2ExYzc4YjctMDJlZC00M2QzLTk5NDUtNDhiMDhmMzhkZWQ4&hl=en_US

Yeah, that sounds just like a captain of capitalism to me!  Not.

As for his being labeled a "Christian fundamentalist," correct me if I am wrong, but isn't fundamentalism associated with Protestantism? If so, it should be noted that the guy wanted to reform the Reformation so that the "Protestant Labour Church," i.e., Lutheranism, Anglicanism, Baptism, etc., would be abolished and absorbed back into the Catholic Church because the Reformation was "only an excuse to try to destroy the Catholic Church in the first place." 


Personally, I think that he has bought into too many Illuminati theories and played too many video games. He is also hung up on Kant, among others.

He's one of the strangest "Christian fundamentalist" and "Tea Party wannabee" cats that I've ever run across: Against abortion, but only because he wants to increase the birthrate. For eugenics. For nationalisation of industry and redistribution of wealth. He also favours state ownership of the means of production and redistribution of the assets of multi-national corporations to combat global warming.  For the welfare state. For Judeo-Christian culture, but religion not so much. Loves hookers. Mad at his feminist mummy and sister for making him learn how to knit.

He is not talking about Christianity when he talks about a Christian Europe. He is talking about Western Judeo-Christian CULTURE. He calls himself "moderately" religious, at best.   I think that many agnostics and atheists will be surprised to learn that he considers them to be "Christians." As an atheist, I know that I sure as hell was.

See what you can learn when you do your own research and not accept the "truth" from the MSM?

Anyway, I have been writing about the cultural clash in Europe for years. Too many here accused me of fearmongering. Well, hopefully, you now know that there is a very real turmoil under the surface in Europe and, as Viscount Grey of Fallondon said in 1914, "The lights are going out across Europe and I fear that they will not be lighted again in our lifetimes."


PS:  A word of advice, Americans should be wary about trying to label political parties in Europe. Things aren't always as they seem. In Denmark, which most people believe is a huge, socialist welfare state, the governing party is Venstre, which means "The Left." One would think that this would mean that Venstre was a Socialist, Social Democrat or Progressive party. Actually, it is a party that champions the free market. In the UK, David Cameron is a "conservative," but he would never be considered such in the US.  The LibDems are to the right of Labour.  I have a hard time seeing many of the Tea Party supporting the current Tories. 

Hitler's Ghost Haunts Europe




Islamists a/k/a Islamic extremists set up Sharia law-controlled zones in British cities




London, the 13th-biggest Jewish city in the world has an aging Jewish population. There are less than 200,000 Jews in Britain and 100,000 Brits convert to Islam every year. Lord Ahmed only has to threaten and the country kowtows. The Archbishop of Canterbury has called for shar'ia law to be introduced.

British schools are removing the Holocaust and the Crusades from GCSE coursework for fear of offending Muslims.

I think that I've told many of you about Anjem Choudary.  He is the firebrand radical imam, who was interviewed on ABC's “This Week” with Christiane Amanpour.  While Ms Amanpour neglected to confront him when he claimed: “one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House”, she also conveniently forgot to inform the audience that Choudary has told the Royal Family "to convert or else" (and has threatened to decapitate the Queen, Prince Charles, Prince WIlliam and Prince Harry), has posted photographs of Buckingham Palace, Nelson's Column, St. Paul's, Westminster Abbey, The Tower, Windsor Castle and many other historic landmarks after Islamification. He has also said that all homosexuals will be executed when Shari'a becomes the Law of the Realm. You should also know that Choudary and his fellow radical imams danced in the streets following 09.11.01.

While Ground Zero was still smouldering, a Jewish yeshiva student reading the Psalms was stabbed 27 times on a London bus.

The cover of the New Statesman, a left-wing magasine, depicted a large Star of David stabbing the Union Jack. Oxford professor Tom Paulin, a noted poet, told an Egyptian interviewer that American Jews, who move to the West Bank and Gaza, "should be shot dead."

The Islamist Lutfur Rhaman was recently elected as the first executive mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets could offer us a harrowing glimpse into Europe's Eurabian future.  He belongs to the Islamic Forum of Europe, an organisation which has expressed contempt for democracy and support for jihad and the imposition of shari'a law on British society.  Azad Ali, the IFE's community affairs coordinator in London, was quoted declaring: "Democracy...if it means at the expense of not implementing the sharia, of course no one agrees with that." A 2009 recruitment manual for the group states its programme in unequivocal language:

"Our goal is not simply to invite people and give da'wah [call to the faith]. Our goal is to create the True Believer, to then mobilise those believers into an organised force for change who will carry out da'wah, hisbah [enforcement of Islamic law] and jihad [struggle]. This will lead to social change and iqamatud-Deen [an Islamic social, economic and political order]."

The organisation maintains close ties with the East London Mosque in which Jammat al Islami -- a fundamentalist Bangladeshi Islamic party, holds sway.

The rise of a politically active class of Islamic fundamentalists has long been expected in Europe but few thought their rise would be so swift and sudden in Britain. Due to some recent voter approved structural changes in the political organisation of the Borough, the new mayor of the town has almost sole authority over a nearly U.S.D. 1 billion budget. His authority to effect change to Borough rules and regulations is without precedent in the history of local British government.

What, then, can the non-Muslim denizens of Tower Hamlets now expect?

Construction projects for one -- such as the so-called "Hijab Gates" -- huge arches in the shape of the Muslim veil at either end of the area's famous Brick Lane. Community libraries filled, as they have been over the past two years, with extremist Islamic literature. Streets renamed with Islamic motifs (many street signs already appear in English and Bengali). Major community thoroughfares blocked and closed down in celebration of the Eid Festival. And the increasing harassment of Muslim and non- Muslim women who dress immodestly (as was witnessed during the mayoral election campaign).

Antisemitism, wrote a columnist in The Spectator, "has become respectable . . . at London dinner tables." She quoted one member of the House of Lords: "The Jews have been asking for it and now, thank G-d, we can say what we think at last."

In Malmö, Sweden, a surge in anti-Semitic violence from, ahem, "certain quarters" (Muslim) has led Jewish residents to abandon the city in fear for Stockholm and beyond.

In Odense, Denmark, last year superintendent Olav Nielsen announced he would no longer admit Jewish children to the local school because of complaints from Muslims.

In Belgium, thugs beat up the chief rabbi, kicking him in the face and calling him "a dirty Jew." Two synagogues in Brussels were firebombed; a third, in Charleroi, was sprayed with automatic weapons fire.

In Italy, the daily paper La Stampa published a Page 1 cartoon: A tank emblazoned with a Jewish star points its gun at the baby Jesus, who pleads, "Surely they don't want to kill me again?" In Corriere Della Sera, another cartoon showed Jesus trapped in his tomb, unable to rise, because Ariel Sharon, with rifle in hand, is sitting on the sepulchre. The caption: "Non resurrexit."

In Amsterdam, mayor Lodewijk Asscher is considering using police offcers posing as Jews in an attempt to stamp out anti-semitic violence. And, secret recordings have been shown that display young Muslim men shouting and making Nazi salutes in different areas of the city.

The Norwegian government, cheered on by the Socialists, named Mahdi Hasan as the 2009 Role Model of the Year. Hasan has publicly called for a ban on homosexuality enforced by execution, if necessary. Was he condemned? No. He was applauded.

The police in the Norwegian capital Oslo revealed that 2009 set yet another record: compared to 2008, there were twice as many cases of assault rapes. In each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant.

Muslim-Arab schoolchildren in primary school started the custom of using separate taps, one for the "muslims" and the other for the "French". Muslims leaders requested separate changing rooms for the students "since circumcised males cannot undress alongside the unclean". (Antisemitism in French Schools: Turmoil of a Republic, Georges Bensoussan).  How do you say "Jim Crow" in French?

According to French-government statistics, rapes in the housing projects have risen between 15 and 20% every year since 1999. In these neighbourhoods, women, including non-Muslims, have indeed begun veiling only to escape harassment and violence. In the suburb of La Courneuve, 77% of veiled women report that they wear the veil to avoid the wrath of Islamic morality patrols. 

In Spain, Muslims use Article 525 of the Spanish Penal Code, which makes it a crime to offend the feelings of the members of a religious confession, to sue people like teachers that have the unmitigated gall to discuss issues like Serrano ham.

Many banks are abandoning the so-called piggy banks, because they are afraid of losing Muslim customers. Muslims regard the pig as an unclean animal.

In Germany, a rabbinical student was beaten up in downtown Berlin and a grenade was thrown into a Jewish cemetery. Thousands of neo-Nazis held a rally, marching near a synagogue on the Jewish sabbath. Graffiti appeared on a synagogue in the western town of Herford: "Six million were not enough." 

German butchers who sell pork are targeted by Muslim extremists. Muslims occasionally spit on sausages on sale at open-air markets.

In some European cities Muslim taxi drivers refuse to transport dogs, even blind persons with guide dogs.  




 Norway: A Tolerant, Inclusive, Diverse, Multicultural Society For Everyone...Except Jews


Some schools in Berlin have installed two separate entrances – one for German Christians and Jews and the other for Muslim Arabs and Turks.
 
In Lyon, France, a car was rammed into a synagogue and set on fire.   In Montpellier, the Jewish religious center was firebombed; so were synagogues in Strasbourg and Marseille; so was a Jewish school in Creteil. A Jewish sports club in Toulouse was attacked with Molotov cocktails, and on the statue of Alfred Dreyfus in Paris, the words "Dirty Jew" were painted. In Bondy, 15 men beat up members of a Jewish football team with sticks and metal bars. The bus that takes Jewish children to school in Aubervilliers has been attacked three times in the last 14 months. According to the police, metropolitan Paris has seen 10 to 12 anti-Jewish incidents per day since Easter.

Walls in Jewish neighborhoods have been defaced with slogans proclaiming "Jews to the gas chambers" and "Death to the Jews." The weekly journal Le Nouvel Observateur published an appalling libel: It said Israeli soldiers rape Palestinian women, so that their relatives will kill them to preserve "family honor." The French ambassador to Great Britain was not sacked -- and did not apologize -- when it was learned that he had told guests at a London dinner that the world's troubles were the fault of "that shitty little country, Israel."

Atatürk sought to insure Turkey's prosperity and relative peace by tamping down on religious fervour.  Women were shunned for wearing a hijab as late as the 1990s.  Now, a visit to the neighbourhood of Bala without being properly veiled and covered will result, at minimum, in a woman being called a "wh0re."
 
"Teachers (in the UK) are being forced to report children as young as three to the authorities for using alleged ‘racist’ language."

Munira Mirza, a senior advisor to London Mayor Boris Johnson, said schools were being made to spy on nursery age youngsters by the Race Relations Act 2000.

More than a quarter of a million children in Britain have been accused of racism since it became law, she said.

Writing in Prospect magazine, she said: ‘The more we seek to measure racism, the more it seems to grow.

‘Teachers are now required to report incidents of racist abuse among children as young as three to local authorities, resulting in a massive increase of cases and reinforcing the perception that we need an army of experts to manage race relations from cradle to grave.

‘Does this heightened awareness of racism help to stamp it out? Quite the opposite. It creates a climate of suspicion and anxiety.’

The Act compelled 43,000 public authorities, including schools and churches, ‘to promote good relations between persons of different racial groups’. Details of the incidents are logged on databases.






Teachers are allowed to report racism even if the alleged ‘victim’ was not offended or if the child does not understand what they were saying.

Freedom of Information replies obtained by civil liberties group the Manifesto Club show that between 2002 and 2009, 280,000 incidents have been reported.

This kind of dangerous thought policing has become a mainstay in England.  A few months ago, 5 year-olds were sent to sensitivity training because they did not like Middle Eastern food and, were therefore, racists.  One girl had the audacity to utter ""Yuk!" 

Just so that some of my Commonwealth brothers and sisters won't feel left out....

Over in Australia in 2006, Sheikh Taj el-Din al-Hilali, Australia’s most senior Muslim cleric, delivered a sermon referring to a recent rape victim thus:

"If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside . . . without cover, and the cats come to eat it . . . whose fault is it, the cats’ or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."

In Canada, immigrants wishing to live in the small Canadian town of Herouxville, Quebec, must not stone women to death in public, burn them alive or throw acid on them, according to an "extraordinary" set of rules released by the local council.  

"We wish to inform these new arrivals that the way of life which they abandoned when they left their countries of origin cannot be recreated here," said the declaration, which makes clear women are allowed to drive, vote, dance, write checks, dress how they want, work and own property.  Therefore we consider it completely outside these norms to … kill women by stoning them in public, burning them alive, burning them with acid, circumcising them etc."

Salam Elmenyawi, president of the Muslim Council of Montreal, said the declaration had "SET THE CLOCK BACK FOR DECADES."

Outrageous, I know!  What's next?  Telling us that we have to drive on the right side of the road when we immigrate to the United States?  Hell, no, not only can we not drive 55, but right lane?  Shirley, you can't be serious!

Oh, while we are in Canada, parents if you have a daughter and live in Ontario, please know that she will be segregated from the "general population" at Valley Park Middle School in Toronto if she is on her period.  She is "unclean" and must sit in the back while the visiting imam leads the public school students in Islamic prayers on Fridays.  Oh, you thought that there was separation of church and state in Canada?  There is.  There's just not that much separation of mosque and state.






Norwegian Finance Minister Kristin Halvorsen all smiles during Anti-Israel demonstration
Sign behind says, “The greatest axis of evil: USA and Israel” and many in the crowd are chanting
“Death to Jews!”


In 1936, during the Cable Street riots, the British Union of Fascists jeered at London Jews, “Go back to Palestine!”, “Palestine” being in those days the designation for the Jewish homeland. Helen Thomas jeered at today’s Jews, “Get the hell out of Palestine,” “Palestine” being now the designation for the land illegally occupied by the Jewish "apartheid state" even though it has never been an Arab state. “Go home,” advised Miss Thomas, “to Poland and Germany.” Wherever a Jew is, whatever a Jew is, he should be something else somewhere else. And then he can be hated for that, too.

 "At the start of the 21st century," writes Pierre-Andre Taguieff, a well-known social scientist, in a new book, "we are discovering that Jews are once again select targets of violence. . . . Hatred of the Jews has returned to France."

But of course, it never left. Not France; not Europe. Antisemitism, the oldest bigotry known to man, has been a part of European society since time immemorial. In the aftermath of the Holocaust, open Jew-hatred became unfashionable; but fashions change, and Europe is reverting to type.

There are websites now tracking the violence and anti-Semitism in Europe.  It is frightening.






Party in Turkey responsible for organising the Gaza flotilla.



Hitler's Ghost Haunts Europe.


Update:  On 12.21.11:

 
"Three senior judges on the Court of Appeal in London ruled that a baby girl born out of wedlock must be adopted to save her from the risk of being slaughtered in an ‘honour killing" even though the child's father wants to raise her with his wife.


'It would be a matter of intense, almost unimaginable shame to him and his family.' 

- Mrs Justice Parker


If the unmarried Muslim woman’s father found out about the child, he would feel such ‘unimaginable shame’ he could unleash a vengeful bloodbath by killing the baby and his whole family, three senior judges agreed.

So they made the extraordinary order to have the one-year-old girl – known as Baby Q – adopted for her own safety.

The court heard Mrs Justice Parker had been ‘persuaded by the evidence of the police’ that the mother and baby Q could be at ‘a very high level of risk’ if the baby’s birth was to become known in the wider community.

The police force in question was not identified, nor the social services department involved in the case. But the court was told that social workers, police and the mother of baby Q were all in agreement that she should be adopted.

Still hopeful of taking custody of his child, F launched an appeal, but this was rejected yesterday by three senior judges, Lord Justice Munby, Lady Justice Black and Lord Justice Kitchin.

They agreed with the first judge that there were several good reasons why F and his wife – who now have a baby of their own – should not be allowed to bring up baby Q.

Among them was the ‘tension’ that would be caused by F’s wife looking after her philandering husband’s illegitimate child as well as her own.

Both F and his wife also lacked ‘empathy and insight’, and were criticised as being incapable of dealing with the little girl’s feelings as she grew older and wanted to learn the details of her ‘very unfortunate start in life’.

The judges concluded: ‘The risks – physical, emotional, short and long term – are too great for Q to be brought up by her father.’"


Related Reading:

Hitler's Ghost Haunts Europe

Norway: A Tolerant, Inclusive, Diverse, Multicultural Society For Everyone...Except Jews...Part I 

Occupy Wall Street & Anti-Semitism

 Did Obama Throw A Beer Summit?

 The Answer Is Obvious

A Circus Parade of Freaks, Anti-Semites, Bare-Breasted Ladies, Radicals, Pinkos, and Hardly An "Average, Hard-Working, Middle-Class American" In Sight

Nazism Was Not Based In Christianity

Why Anti-Semitism Is Moving Toward The Mainstream

Memo to Jews: After They Come for the Catholic Church, They Will Come For Us

The Anti-Semitic/Anti-Israel Origins Of Occupy Wall Street Are Ignored By The Media

A Century of Palestinian Rejectionism

Judge Richard Goldstone’s Mea Culpa, in the Pages of the New York Times!

Ron Paul: All Aboard! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Haaaa! Mental Wounds Still Screaming! Driving Me Insane I'm Going Off The Rails On My Crazy Train! (And I Want To Take You Along For The Ride)

Obama - The Anti-Israel President

Update on Norway: The Poison of Multiculturalism

The Last Jews Of Baghdad: Just SEVEN Remain (And They Fear For Their Lives After Being Named By WikiLeaks)

Islamic Naziism

 

 

24 July 2011

Aggregation of Data on Norway Horror

New info on Norway:

·         He kept a 1,500 page day-to-day diary detailing his attack and posted it on the internet hours before the attack.

·         Took nine years to plan the attacks at a cost of 300,000 euros.

·         He lists 100 political parties in Europe that "directly or indirectly support the Islamisation of Europe," including the Conservatives, Labour and the Lib Dems in the UK. He even lists the numbers of "Category A and B traitors" who should be killed in each country, saying there are 62,216 in the UK.

·         Angela Merkel, Tony Blair, Nicholas Sarkozy, and Gordon Brown were specifically name as Category A traitors and marked for death. 

·         Journalists like Melanie Phillips, a Jewish atheist in Britain, were on his target list, which is very strange since she has written volumes about the Islamification of Europe and the clash of the two diametrically-opposed cultures.  Her books include “Londonistan” and “The World Turned Upside Down:  The Global Battle over God, Truth, and Power.”

·         He was an eco farmer and BP oil fields were on his target lists.

·         His manifesto talks about a secret meeting in London in April 2002 to reconstitute the Knights Templar and said it was attended by nine representatives of eight different European countries, including Breivik.  Every one of them is, allegedly, prepared to act in their own countries as he did.

·         He estimates there are between 15 and 80 such "knights" in western Europe, each of whom is a "solo martyr cell" who is "completely unknown to our enemies and has a minimal chance of being exposed.”

·         He talks about ridding Europe of cultural Marxism and Islamists and wants Europe to be more like Japan or South Korea with Socialist programmes, but nationalist and homogenous.

·         His aim was to achieve a "monoculture" modelled on Japan or South Korea.

·         These "role models” – Japan and South Korea - "represent many of the European classical conservative principles of the 1950s" because they are "scientifically advanced, economically progressive" societies "which will not accept multiculturalism or Cultural Marxist principles.”

·         He believes in eugenics and that the world is overpopulated and must be reduced to 2.5 billion by 2083, 400th anniversary of the Battle of Vienna. 

 The manifesto contains a tally of the number of people, two million, Breivik believes should be murdered in his crusade.

Breivik says Hitler was "a traitor to the Germanic and all European tribes" because he "had the military capabilities necessary to liberate Jerusalem and the nearby provinces from Islamic occupation" but failed to do so.

·         His personal preference would be for 45,000 people to be killed and another million wounded, which he says reflects the number of people killed and raped by Muslims since 1999, which he calls the beginning of the "European civil war.”

·         "For me, personally, it was my government's involvement in the attacks on Serbia."

·         "It was completely unacceptable how the U.S. and Western European regimes bombed our Serbian brothers. All they (the Serbs) wanted was to drive out Islam by deporting the Albanian Muslims back to Albania."

·         "I don't hate Muslims at all. I acknowledge that there are magnificent Muslim individuals in Europe. In fact, I have had several Muslim friends over the years, some of which I still respect. Muslim individuals who do not assimilate 100% within 2020 will be deported as soon as we manage to seize power.”

·         Politically, he describes himself as a “revolutionary conservative, cultural conservative, Vienna school of thought (the halt of the Ottoman Turkish invasion at Vienna in 1683), economically liberal.”

·         He was disgusted by the Norway’s association with the Nobel Peace Prize because it had been awarded to Yasser Arafat.

·         Religiously, he describes himself as a “Christian, Protestant, but I support a reformation of Protestantism leading to it being absorbed by Catholicism.  The ‘Protestant Labour Church’ has to be deconstructed as its creation was an attempt to abolish the Church.”

·         Breivik was a freemason (as was the Dunblane mass murderer), said a spokesman for the Saint Johannes lodge in Oslo.

·         “There are situations in which cruelty is necessary, and refusing to apply necessary cruelty is a betrayal of the people whom you wish to protect.”

·         ‘The preferred method is to attack in a violent and deceptive form (shock attack), usually with limited forces (1-2 individuals).’

·         “Once you decide to strike, it is better to kill too many than not enough, or you risk reducing the ideological impact of the strike.  Explain what you have done (in an announcement distributed prior to operation) and make sure that everyone understands that we, the free peoples of Europe, are going to strike again and again.  Do not apologise, make excuses or express regret for you are acting in self-defence or in a preemptive manner.  In many ways, morality has lost its meaning in our struggle.  The question of good and evil is reduced to one simple choice.  For every free, patriotic European, only one choice remains:  Survive or perish.  Some innocent will perish in our operations as they are simply at the wrong place at the wrong time.  Get used (sic) the idea.  The needs of many will always surpass the needs of a few.”

·         He was a member of the Progress Party, Norway’s second largest political party, which is the only Norwegian party to support Israel’s right to exist.  The day before the horrific attacks, the Foreign Minister had called for a Palestinian state at the island where some of the children had called for the boycott of Israel.  This had been reported; however, now that it is known that he had been planning the attacks for 9 years, there would not seem to be any connection.  Thus, we don’t have the first incidence of a Nazi killing anyone to protect or protest on behalf of Jews or a Jewish state. 


"He was motivated by a desire to bring about a revolution in society," said Anders Behring Breivik's lawyer.

Well, sheesh, so were Maximillian Robespierre, Karl Marx, Fredrich Engels, Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, Lev Davidovich Bronshtein, Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili, Ho Chi Minh, Saloth Sar, Ernesto " Che" Guevara, Francisco Paulino Hermenegildo Teódulo Franco y Bahamonde, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega, Evo Morales, Huey Newton, and Bill Ayres.

I think Anders Behring Breivik is an evil man.

Unlike idiots with the Che or Mao shirts, the left would go nuts if they saw anyone in an Anders Behring Breivik t-shirt.

Irony is lost on most of them.

22 July 2011

World Exclusive! Anders Behring Breivik Interviews Anders Behring Breivik!

In his manifesto, Anders Behring Breivik conducts a worldwide exclusive interview of Anders Behring Breivik, the soon-to-be mass murderer of Norway.  Not really.  He asks questions rhetorically and answers them.  Unfortunately, no one in the media has bothered to read what he has written.  I am reading it.  I will be revealing some of the more fascinating exchanges over the next few days as I get through the 1500 pages.  If you come across anything of interest, please email me at predicthistunpredictpast@gmail.com.


Q:  "What kind of society/political platform are we seeking to build/restore. What does a cultural conservative / nationalist / monocultural society constitute?"

A.  The closest similarity you will find and a good comparison is especially the Japanese and South Korean societies and to a certain degree the Taiwanese model. These three models contain a majority of all the political principles we seek to restore. They represent many of the European classical conservative principles of the 1950’s (culturally) with modern twists; in other words a monocultural, scientifically advanced, economically progressive society with an exceptional level of welfare but which will not accept multiculturalism or Cultural Marxist principles.

Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are today the most peaceful societies due to their monocultural model. Crime is more or less non-existent and you can travel freely everywhere without the constant fear of getting raped, ravaged, robbed or killed. They have embraced many positive aspects of globalism but have rejected many of the negative aspects.

The fundaments (sic) of the patriarchal structures and family values are very strong in these three countries as the wave of feminism lacked several catalyst components (which made it a lot less potent) due to the rejection of multiculturalist/cultural Marxist thought during the 60s and 70s. Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are today our role models for the conservative movement. They are peaceful and anti-imperialistic just like we have aspirations to be.

When listening to Marxist propaganda, the typical claims are all based on lies. It is a falsehood to claim that the cultural conservatives in Europe are imperialistic and violent by nature. We do NOT want to copy the failed aggressive totalitarian fascist dictatorships like Nazi Germany, far from it. We hate everything Nazi Germany stood for, in fact we view the current EUSSR / Multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe as totalitarian Nazi regimes.

We condemn imperialistic thought and we condemn genocide and violence in general. Our current struggle is based on a pre-emptive struggle (self defence). We have no territorial claims that will violate any sovereign European or other civilised country, the exception being our Middle Eastern foreign policy plan. This involves a Crusade, or to use a more modern phrase; an anti-Jihad campaign, preventing the continuation of the genocides against the Maronite, Assyrian, Coptic and other Middle Eastern Christian peoples and restoring parts of Anatolia under Greek and Armenian rule once again. Launching crusades to counter ongoing Jihads (there are 20+ Jihad fronts around the world) is acceptable, but under no circumstances shall we attack or annex territory belonging to our fellow Christian brothers and sisters, or our Buddhist or Hindu allies.  Hindus and Buddhists are considered brothers in our common fight against Jihadi imperialism, atrocities and genocides. 

Any cultural conservative Christian country/state declaring war against another Christian state (such as the former Serbian-Croatian war) will be regarded as the enemy of the future cultural conservative political alliance (European Federation) and will be punished severely.

Q:  “How would I classify my religious beliefs?”

A:  “I’m not going to pretend I’m a very religious person as that would be a lie. I’ve always been very pragmatic and influenced by my secular surroundings and environment…Religion is a crutch for many weak people and many embrace religion for self serving reasons as a source for drawing mental strength…Since I am not a hypocrite, I’ll say directly that this is my agenda as well.  However, I have not yet felt the need to ask God for strength, yet…But I’m pretty sure I will pray to God as I’m rushing through my city, guns blazing…”

Q:  “As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings, what should be our civilisational [sic] objectives, how do you envision a perfect Europe?

A:  “…rationalist thought (a certain degree of national Darwinism) should be the fundament [sic] of our societies.  Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man.  I’m not going to pretend I’m a very religious person, as that would be a lie. I’ve always been very pragmatic and influenced by my secular surroundings and environment…. Religion is a crutch for many weak people…I have not yet felt the need to ask God for strength, yet.”

[His definition of Christianity is also very strange.  As I wrote previously, he wants to turn back the Reformation and see Protestantism reabsorbed into the Catholic Church.  Whether this is for religious doctrinal and ritual purposes or for some fantastical notion of a reconstituted Knights Templar, the Holy Grail, and the Crusades is not entirely clear at this point in my reading.  I am open to any other interpretations so please let the river of information flow...]

Q:  “[You] object to Islam because [you see] Europe as being taken over by Muslims, and Europeans as [not only] losing their identity [but gleefully giving it away].   What is your solution?  Is your solution to have Norway and Europe return and preserve their historical culture, which is Christian?”

A:   “As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus…. The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity…. It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way…. So no, you don’t need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).  The European Union has published a school calendar that omits Christian holidays, like Christmas and Easter, while noting significant Islam holidays.” 

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/07/anders_behring_breivik_youtube.php 

Q:  In "2083: European Declaration of Independence," Section 3.139 (p. 1309) is entitled “Distinguishing between cultural Christendom and religious Christendom –reforming our suicidal Church.”  What is the difference between the two?

A:  A majority of so called agnostics and atheists in Europe are cultural conservative Christians without even knowing it. So what is the difference between cultural Christians and religious Christians?

If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian.

A majority of Christians, especially liberal, humanist Christians oppose the doctrines of self defence. I believe that self defence is a central part of Christianity as documented in another part of this book. The modern day pacifist Christianity is among other things a result of our current regimes and their deliberate influence of the Church. They castrated and made the Church impotent and irrelevant, we will rejuvenate it by implementing our own reforms. But pragmatism will be the basis for which direction we chose to go. A strong church (on certain areas) is essential for the unity of our European countries.

It is essential that we preserve and even strengthen the Church and European Christendom in general (by awarding it more political influence on certain areas), when it comes to the moral, cultural and social aspects of society. It should even be granted monopoly on certain areas to strengthen European cohesion/unity. This does not mean that we will continue allow the feminist-liberal, humanist faction of the Church to propagate its pacifist-humanist (suicidal) views/anti self defence doctrines. The Church must be anti-pacifist in the manner that it actively preaches self-defence and even support preemptive strikes as a mechanic to safeguard either Christian minorities in Muslim dominated areas or even Europe itself.

We must ensure that a sustainable and traditional version of Christendom is propagated. This will involve that we take decisive steps to disallow the liberal leaders of the church to prevent them from committing suicide. We must ensure that the churches of Europe propagate an values that are sustainable and that will even contribute to safeguard Christian European values long term. European Christendom and the cross will be the symbol in which every cultural conservative can unite under in our common defence. It should serve as the uniting symbol for all Europeans whether they are agnostic or atheists.

The pacifist/suicidal Christians must never be allowed to dominate the church again which one of the reasons why I personally believe that the protestant Church in Europe should once again should reform to become Catholic (Nordic countries, the UK, Germany, Benelux etc). Re-introduction of cultural and Church aspects relating to honour should be the core of our objective when reforming the Church. My hope is that the future nationalist leadership in Western European countries will agree. At the very least, we must support the conservative, anti-pacifist cultural Christian leaders and ensure that they are able to influence the European churches. There must however be clear distinctions. The Church must not put any limits whatsoever on issues relating to science, research and development. Europe will continue to be the world’s center for research and development in all areas, strengthened by a predictable and “unchangeable” cultural framework. This again will considerably strengthen European and societal cohesion and therefore contribute to sustainable societies where harmony, progress, freedom and the furtherance of mankind are the primary civilisational pillars.

Manifesto:

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BwZX2bK7Uc5dY2ExYzc4YjctMDJlZC00M2QzLTk5NDUtNDhiMDhmMzhkZWQ4&hl=en_US