Protesters
take part in a 'Stop the War' demonstration march from the Israeli
Embassy to the Houses of Parliament on 26 July 2014 in London. (Photo:
Getty)
By Brendan O'Neill
There has been a lot of talk over the past two weeks about whether it
is anti-Semitic to oppose Israel’s attack on Gaza. Radical Leftists and
liberal commentators have insisted (perhaps a bit too much?) that there
is nothing remotely anti-Semitic about their anger with Israel or their
fury on behalf of battered, bruised and bombed Palestinians. And of
course they are right that it is entirely possible to oppose Israel’s
militarism without harbouring so much as a smidgen of dislike for the
Jewish people. Some will oppose the war in Gaza simply because they are
against wars in general, especially ones that impact on civilians.
However, it seems pretty clear to me that much of the left in Europe
and America is becoming more anti-Semitic, or at least risks falling
into the trap of anti-Semitism, sometimes quite thoughtlessly. In the
language it uses, in the ideas it promotes, in the way in which it talks
about the modern world, including Israel, much of the Left has adopted a
style of politics that has anti-Semitic undertones, and sometimes
overtones. The key problem has been the Left’s embrace of conspiratorial
thinking, its growing conviction that the world is governed by what it
views as uncaring “cabals”, “networks”, self-serving lobbyists and gangs
of bankers, all of which has tempted it to sometimes turn its
attentions towards those people who historically were so often the
object and the target of conspiratorial thinking – the Jews.
Yes, one can hate Israel’s attack on Gaza without hating the Jews.
But there’s no denying that the hatred being expressed for Israel’s
attack on Gaza is different to the opposition to all other acts
of militarism in recent times. Just compare the huge 2003 Hyde Park
demo against the Iraq War with the recent London demos against Israel’s
attack on Gaza. The former had an air of resignation; it expressed a
mild, middle-class sense of disappointment with Tony Blair, through
safe, soft slogans like “Not In My Name”. The latter, by contrast, have
been fiery and furious, with screeching about murder and mayhem and
demands that the Israeli ambassador to the UK be booted out. Some
attendees have held up placards claiming that Zionists control the British media while others have accused both London and Washington of “grovelling” before an apparently awesomely powerful Israeli Lobby.
This is a recurring theme in anti-Israel sentiment today: the idea
that a powerful, sinister lobby of Israel lovers has warped our
otherwise respectable leaders here in the West, basically winning
control of Western foreign policy. You see it in cartoons depicting
Israeli leaders as the puppet masters of politicians like William Hague and Tony Blair. You can hear it in Alexi Sayle’s much-tweeted claim that the “Western powers” kowtow to Israel because they are “frightened of it… frightened of the power that it wields”. You can see it in the arguments of John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in their popular book The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy,
which holds an apparently super-powerful pro-Israel lobby in the heart
of Washington responsible for the Iraq War and all other kinds of
disasters. The claim is often made that Israel has corrupted Western
officials, commanding them to carry out its dirty work.
Sound familiar? Yes, this has terrible echoes of the old racist idea
that Jewish groups controlled Western politics and frequently propelled
the world into chaos – an idea that was especially popular in the early
to mid-20th-century Europe. Very often, anti-Israel protesters treat
Israel not just as a nation at war – like Britain, America or France,
which also frequently launch wars that kill huge numbers of civilians –
but also as the warper of policy and morality in the West, as a source
of poison in global affairs, as the architect of instability across the
globe. Indeed, a few years ago a poll of Europeans found that a majority
of them view Israel as “the biggest threat to world peace”. So Israel
is undoubtedly singled out by Leftists and others, and even more
significantly it is singled out in a way that the Jews used to be
singled out – that is, as a sinister, self-serving corrupter of nations
and causer of chaos.
Much of today’s anti-Israel protesting has a conspiracy-theory feel
to it, with its talk about powerful lobby groups designing wars behind
closed doors in order to isolate Israel’s enemies and boost Israel’s
fortunes. And this is in keeping with Left-wing politics generally,
today. The Left has increasingly embraced a conspiracy-theory view of
the world. It is now very common to hear Leftists talk about the “cabals of neocons” who control world affairs, or the “cult of bankers” who wreak havoc on our economies, or the Murdoch Empire that “orchestrates public life from the shadows”
(to quote Labour MP Tom Watson). All seriously analytical and nuanced
readings of international trends and political dynamics have been
elbowed aside by contemporary Leftists, who prefer instead to argue that
dark, hidden, mysterious forces are ruining politics, plotting wars,
and enriching themselves at the expense of the poor. And, as history
shows us, there is a thin line between railing against wicked cabals and
cults and wondering out loud whether the Jews are secretly running
world affairs, or at least wielding a disproportionate influence.
Indeed, some of the most influential trends in Left-wing politics
over the past five years – including the Occupy movement and the
Wikileaks movement – were both given to conspiracy-theorising and both
also had a bit of a problem with anti-Semitism. So Occupy was
kickstarted by Adbusters, a magazine convinced that powerful
corporations control the masses’ fickle minds. In 2004, Adbusters
published a disgustingly anti-Semitic article titled “Why Won’t Anyone Say They Are Jewish?”,
which listed the neocons in the Bush administration and put a black
mark next to the names of those who are Jewish. Not surprisingly, Occupy
itself, which was obsessed with the baleful influence of small cliques
of bankers and other faceless, evil people, often crossed the line into
anti-Semitism, as the Washington Post reported. And Wikileaks, too, which is also a borderline conspiracy-theory outfit, what with its obsession with the “conspiratorial interactions among the political elite”, has had issues with anti-Semitism: one of its key researchers, Israel Shamir, was exposed by the Guardian as being “notorious for [his] Holocaust denial and publishing a string of anti-Semitic articles”.
It is not an accident that the three key planks of the Left-wing
outlook today – the anti-Israel anti-war sentiment, the shallow
anti-capitalism of Occupy, and the worship of those who leak info from
within the citadels of power – should all have had issues with
anti-Semitism. It is because the left, feeling isolated from the public
and bereft of any serious means for understanding modern political and
economic affairs, has bought into a super-simplistic, black-and-white,
borderline David Icke view of the world as a place overrun and ruled by
cabals and cults and sinister lobby groups. And who has always, without
fail, been the final cabal, the last cult, to find themselves
shouldering the ultimate blame for the warped, hidden workings of
politics, the economy and foreign turmoil? You got it – the Jews.
No comments:
Post a Comment