'Auschwitz
meant that six million Jews were killed, and thrown on the waste-heap
of Europe, for what they were considered: money-Jews. Finance capital
and the banks, the hard core of the system of imperialism and
capitalism, had turned the hatred of men against money and
exploitation, and against the Jews. . . . Antisemitism is really a
hatred of capitalism.'
- Ulrike Meinhof, volk hero and a left-wing German terrorist of the 1970s
By Guy Milliere
For
nearly two millennia, the European continent has been a land of
persecution and hatred for the Jewish people. The blood libels and the
vilest accusations against the Jews have been accompanied by violence,
pogroms, and confinement in ghettos and of course death camps. Eight
decades ago, in the 1930's, anti-Semitism was considered honorable and
aroused few objections. Later, the Nazi machine set into motion the
"final solution," and zealous collaborators existed in virtually all of
continental Europe. "Willing executioners" were not only Germans -- far
from it.
After 1945, anti-Semitism suddenly became unmentionable, and European
anti-Semites had to be silent. But they did not disappear. In the
1960s, after the Six Day War, a new way of being anti-Semitic emerged
that allowed them to recycle their old way: they could not be
"anti-Semites", but they could be "anti-Israelis". They rejoiced when
General de Gaulle in France
spoke of the Jews as a "proud and domineering people," and saw those
words as a kind of official sanction, a green light. Since then,
"anti-Israelism" rapidly became mainstream. European politicians,
diplomats and journalists have done their best never to miss an
opportunity to berate and criticize Israel. Anti-Semitic terms used in the 1930s began to be used again, this time to describe the Jewish State.
When the "Palestinian cause" appeared, it immediately became a sacred
cause in Europe, never mind what sort of values or governance it
espoused. When it seemed possible to accuse Jews of "behaving like
Nazis," the opportunity was not missed.
Today, hatred of Israel is one of the most shared and prominent
feelings in Europe. Using anti-Semitic terms to criticize Israel is
common, normal and "politically correct." Fighting for the "Palestinian
cause" in the name of "peace" is the only fight that can bring together
politicians from the left and the right. Any terrorist attack against
Israel is almost unanimously described as a fruit of the "cycle of
violence" and of "Israeli intransigence," never mind that it is actually
the Palestinians who historically have been intransigent. An Israeli
response to a terrorist attack is immediately criticized by European
diplomats as "disproportionate." A Palestinian attack is never
criticized at all.
When anti-Israeli groups rally to boycott Israel and violently invade
stores selling Israeli products, the only condemnations to be heard are
from Jewish organizations.
It is in this context that the recent EU decision to ban its members
from dealing with Jewish communities and with any Jew living beyond
"1967 borders" must be viewed.
European leaders who took the decision, and those who approved it, know perfectly well that there has never been a "1967 border," only armistice lines drawn in 1949, but they act as if they did not know. European leaders know perfectly well how indefensible the "1967 borders" are for the Israeli army, but again they act as if they did not know.
European leaders who took the decision, and those who approved it, know perfectly well that there has never been a "1967 border," only armistice lines drawn in 1949, but they act as if they did not know. European leaders know perfectly well how indefensible the "1967 borders" are for the Israeli army, but again they act as if they did not know.
European leaders also know that the "1967 borders" place the Old City
of Jerusalem and the Western Wall and the Temple Mount (the holiest
site of Judaism) outside the boundaries of Israel. They know, too, what
the loss of these would mean for Israel and the Jewish people, but they
stand their ground. They know, as well, that their position is similar
to that of the Palestinian Authority, which seeks ethnic cleansing of
Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem, but self-righteously insist. They
know that the Golan Heights, under Israeli law and administration since
1981, was used for years by Syria
to shoot down from the plateau at the farmers in the valley, and are
fully aware of the situation in Syria and its al-Qaeda affiliates near
the Golan Heights today, but nonetheless stand fast.
For more than four decades, several European countries, and the
European Union itself, have established close and compromising
relationships with various regimes in the Arab world. They have become
prisoners of what is called Europe's "Arab Policy" -- with full support
for the "Palestinian cause" and "anti-Israeli" activities and movements,
regardless of how thoroughly detrimental these might be to their own
survival -- as so presented by Bat Ye'or in her prophetic book, Eurabia,
published in 2005.
European leaders who voted for the ban and those who approved it also
stand their ground in part because migration flows have changed the
demographics of Europe, and because in Europe the number of Muslims -- a
significant proportion of whom have become radicalized -- has sharply
increased. Europe today is therefore not only a prisoner of Europe's
"Arab Policy," support for the "Palestinian cause" and "anti-Israeli"
activities and movements: it is also hostage to its Muslim population,
to Islamists, and to the immense success of the campaign of intimidation
waged against it by Muslims, such that any incident, or any political
position unpleasant to Muslims, can lead to riots.
When Israel's leaders appeal to Europe's "moral values," they should
realize that when the subject is Jews, almost all Europeans abandoned
moral values seven decades ago, and the same may be said for their views
of Israel. If moral values are what the Israelis and Jews are looking
for in Europe, they are looking in the wrong place.
Europe has once again chosen cowardice and complicity.
European governments and the European Union are the biggest donors of
financial assistance to the Palestinian cause and the Palestinian
Authority. They are also the biggest donors to most anti-Israel
movements operating in Europe and in Israel. They in fact funded BDS
(Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) movements long before they took the
decision that now makes BDS official.
The Israeli government has warned European governments and the
European Union that this may trigger a "serious relationship crisis
between Europe and Israel;" in reality the crisis has been ongoing for a
long time.
On July 26, Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon ordered the Coordinator of
Government Activities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza to turn down any
request by the European Union concerning these regions.
In an article published July 27 in the Jerusalem Post, Caroline Glick
suggested further Israeli responses to the European decision: "passage
in the Knesset of a law requiring all Israeli entities that agree to
operate under the EU's funding guidelines to register as foreign agents
and report all EU contributions." "Those contributions," she
added,"should be taxed at the highest corporate tax rate."
As "Area C" is the area of Judea and Samaria where Israel exercises
most civil and military authorities, Glick writes that Israel should
"suspend all EU projects in Area C. Future EU projects should be subject
to intense scrutiny by the civil administration. Israel's default
position should be to reject, rather than approve such requests, given
their hostile intent."
Israel's leaders surely see that European governments and the EU are not friends of Israel.
European governments and the EU have never been friends of Israel.
Now, they are less friends of Israel than ever. The likelihood that they
will adopt a more positive attitude toward Israel is nil.
They speak as enemies of Israel. They behave as enemies of Israel. They take decisions only enemies of Israel would take.
They are at war with Israel. They do not wage war directly: they
engage battle through other channels, hypocritically, viciously, and
cowardly.
In the 1940s, Europe was the continent of Auschwitz. Today, Europe is
a continent where politicians and technocrats support what Abba Eban
called the "Auschwitz borders". There is no doubt they hope for results
similar to those obtained in Auschwitz, just by other means.
Related:
Well, Biblically speaking, the remnant of the Holy Roman Empire, EU, made half of clay and half of steal, may not see the same fate as philistines and barbers. But they too will see their worst demise as never seen before on earth...
ReplyDeleteSo at this moment in history it only make sense for EU to also stand against the Children of Israel, when Israel is almost completely surrounded by those who wanted destroyed...
European secular systems has already denounced all That God's words stand for...
So Biblically speaking, nothing is out of line...