The Left Makes Our Case: The Government Is Too Big For Obama To Control

Sometimes, in their rabid desire to defend 'Teh Won,' they give us the best gifts without even realising it...

‘Government Too Vast For Obama to Control…’

THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT! Welcome to the limited government movement! 

He has made the best argument for limited government that I’ve heard a Democrat make in, well, ever. I’m not sure that it was his intention, but thanks!

Here’s Chris Matthews lamenting that Obama doesn’t seem to have his hands on the wheel of the ship of state.

About a year ago, I remember being on the phone with my mum when she asked how the political atmosphere felt on this side of the pond. I told her that I felt like we were on a bus that was careening at 100mph toward a cliff, the massive driver had had a massive heart attack, was slumped over the wheel, and we could not get him out of the seat. Only those in the back, singing ’99 Bottle of Beer on the Wall,’ were oblivious to the coming catastrophe that those paying attention could so clearly see.

Of course, I ended it with the old Will Rogers quip: ‘When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his sleep…Not screaming like all the passengers in his car.’

lol

But, seriously, do Obama supporters realise that they are pleading incompetence, which is what we have been saying all along? The dude has never run so much as a lemonade stand.

BTW: Where are the photographs of Obama on the night of Benghazi? 

We’ve seen Obama in the Situation Room when Osama bin Laden was killed...

 

 We’ve seen the moment that he was told about Newtown...

 

We’ve seen him shooting skeet bruising the hell out of his shoulder...

 
We’ve seen him trapped in a spider web...

 

We’ve seen him meeting with a pirate in the Oval Office...

 

We’ve seen him praying in the Oval Office after the Boston bombing...

 

 

Where are the photos of him on the night of Benghazi? Do they not exist because the official WH photog doesn’t take photos of the President while he is asleep? And, if so, what does that say about the Commander-in-Chief, who knew the first Ambassador in more than 3 decades was missing?

How is an incompetent, neglectful and passive executive better than a malevolent one?  If both end up creating disasters, does it really matter why?

http://tinyurl.com/cs4rhhm