By
Ben Shapiro
While the left lectures Americans about
the historic breakthrough made by NBA free agent Jason Collins in announcing
his sexuality and calls for well-deserved tolerance, they are on full-out
attack against ESPN commentator Chris Broussard for expressing his Christian
views. And now ESPN has been forced to apologize.
It all started when Broussard appeared
on Outside the Lines to talk about Collins. Appearing with ESPN senior
writer LZ Granderson, who is openly gay, Broussard was asked by the host, “How
ready is the NBA and the locker rooms for having an openly gay teammate?”
Broussard answered:
“The
climate in society is very set for this thing to happen …. A lot of people feel
like if you come out and say you don’t agree with homosexuality, you are viewed
as a bigot, you are viewed as intolerant. So I think the climate is right for
somebody to come out and say they are gay. I’ve been texting with players, GMs,
coaches, agents throughout the day … and it’s been overwhelmingly supportive of
Jason, from former teammates to guys who have played against him.” Broussard
acknowledged that a few players said they might be uncomfortable with a gay
player in the showers, but that “I don’t think you’ll see somebody come out and
be against this, whether because of their true feelings or because of political
correctness.”
Later in the conversation, Granderson
said, “If we really want to move toward progress and toward full acceptance, we
have to have this conversation and this process. Broussard then seconded that
motion, and gave an example of that conversation and how it could be
productive:
I’d
like to second what LZ said. “I’m a Christian. I don’t agree with
homosexuality. I think it’s a sin, as I think all sex outside of marriage
between a man and a woman is. [ESPN's] L.Z. [Granderson] knows that. He and I
have played on basketball teams together for several years. We’ve gone out, had
lunch together, we’ve had good conversations, good laughs together. He knows
where I stand and I know where he stands. I don’t criticize him, he doesn’t
criticize me, and call me a bigot, call me ignorant, call me intolerant.
In
talking to some people around the league, there’s a lot Christians in the NBA
and just because they disagree with that lifestyle, they don’t want to be
called bigoted and intolerant and things like that. That’s what LZ was getting
at. Just like I may tolerate someone whose lifestyle I disagree with, he can
tolerate my beliefs. He disagrees with my beliefs and my lifestyle but true
tolerance and acceptance is being able to handle that as mature adults and not
criticize each other and call each other names…
Personally,
I don’t believe that you can live an openly homosexual lifestyle or an openly
premarital sex between heterosexuals, if you’re openly living that type of
lifestyle, then the Bible says you know them by their fruits, it says that’s a
sin. If you’re openly living in unrepentant sin, whatever it may be, not just
homosexuality, adultery, fornication, premarital sex between heterosexuals,
whatever it may be, I believe that’s walking in open rebellion to God and to
Jesus Christ. I would not characterize that person as a Christian because I do
not think the Bible would characterize them as a Christian.
This has been the
traditional Biblical view for thousands of years. Still, traditionally
religious people in the United States, like Broussard, have reached an
understanding and tolerance for those with whom they disagree. Mutual tolerance
between the traditionally religious and proponents of the morality of
homosexuality is what the conversation between Granderson and Broussard was all
about. As Granderson said, “Chris and I have had those uncomfortable
conversations, the NBA now needs to have those uncomfortable conversations.”
Tolerance is the goal. And tolerance requires tolerance on both sides.
But
instead of having those uncomfortable conversations, and coming to mutual
respect for one another’s positions, the left went after Broussard hammer and
tongs. The hashtag #firechrisbroussard quickly skyrocketed on Twitter. The same
left that praised Bob Costas to the skies for randomly sounding off on Kansas
City Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher and gun control now decided that Broussard
was way out of line. The LA Times ran an online poll asking,
“Should Broussard have said what he said on TV?”
Kelly
Dwyer of Yahoo! Sports wrote, “The last thing [gay youths] need is to see
someone like Chris Broussard, who ESPN (and by extension, the NBA) trusts as
both its voice both at games and in-studio, to be referring to them as sinners
who are in ‘open rebellion to God.’” Deadspin’s John Koblin said that it was
“unclear why [Broussard’s opinion was] necessary or even relevant at this
hour.” Variety subtly suggested, “In December, ESPN suspended commentator Rob
Parker for questionable comments on the race of NFL quarterback Robert Griffin
III, then chose not to renew his contract after it expired at year’s end.”
In
response to all this leftist tolerance, ESPN dutifully released a statement
apologizing for Broussard’s comments: “We regret that a respectful discussion
of personal viewpoints became a distraction from today’s news. ESPN is fully
committed to diversity and welcomes Jason Collins’ announcement.” Naturally, Buzzfeed’s Kate Aurthur ripped ESPN anyway for
not sufficiently falling into line: “So no apology from Broussard …. ESPN got
itself into this ridiculous, impossible situation here by relying on one of its
employee's religious beliefs to inform a discussion about the huge Collins news
…. What I would like to know, therefore, is why they put Broussard on
the air to discuss his personal feelings about Collins, homosexuality, and
Christianity, rather than his area of professional expertise — basketball — in
the first place.” Aurthur went on a rampage, calling Broussard “punitive,
unforgiving,” and lamenting that “Collins’ beautiful announcement” had been
tarnished by ESPN’s “outdated, homophobic pit of its own making.”
Broussard’s
opinion was verboten according to the left. Granderson’s was not. The
right was happy to air both opinions. Yet the left thinks that Broussard was
way out of bounds. That’s because the goal of the left in overplaying the Jason
Collins coming out party – a presidential call? Really? – is to portray those
who disagree on homosexuality as bigots and homophobes who want to deny people
like Collins happiness. Broussard never even remotely suggested that Collins
should not have come out. He repeatedly stated that the time was ripe for
Collins to come out. Virtually everyone on the right agrees with that general
perspective. But Broussard violated the most taboo of all standards: he
suggested that he had a different moral view than that of the left. And so now
his job may be in jeopardy.
When
it comes to tyranny and tolerance, the case of Chris Broussard is far more
telling than that of Jason Collins. It is the left that wants tyranny of
expression. Tolerance only extends to those deemed worthy by the left.
Ben
Shapiro is Editor-At-Large of Breitbart News and author of the New York Times
bestseller “Bullies: How the Left’s Culture of Fear and Intimidation
Silences America” (Threshold
Editions, January 8, 2013).
"What I would like to know, therefore, is why they put Broussard on the air to discuss his personal feelings about Collins, homosexuality, and Christianity, rather than his area of professional expertise — basketball — in the first place."
ReplyDeleteWow. Now that is irony. :) It's like hypocrisy and blindness reproduced.