Paul
Robeson
Did Katrina vanden Heuvel think no one would notice her
magazine's affinity with friends of Joseph Stalin?
The left-wing magazine The Nation has published what it
deems America's all-time, most influential top 50 progressives. The
list is very revealing. I will not mention all 50 names, which you
can
review for yourself, but a few are especially interesting.
For starters, it's fascinating that The Nation leads
with Eugene Debs at number 1. Debs was a socialist -- a capital "s"
"Socialist." Fittingly, it was 100 years ago this year, in 1912,
that Debs ran for president on the Socialist Party ticket, placing
fourth in a contest dominated by a progressive Democrat, Woodrow
Wilson, and a progressive Republican, Teddy Roosevelt. Today's
progressives get annoyed if you call them socialists. Well, then,
why is a pure socialist the no. 1 "progressive" on The
Nation's list?
Of course, progressives really get annoyed if you suggest they
bear any sympathies to communism. That being the case, two other
"progressives" on The Nation's list are quite intriguing:
Paul Robeson and I. F. Stone.
Paul Robeson was a communist and gushing admirer of Stalin's
Soviet Union, a proud recipient of the Kremlin's "Stalin Prize."
Even the New York Times could not help but admit that
Robeson was "an outspoken admirer of the Soviet Union." When
Robeson in 1934 returned from his initial pilgrimage to the
Motherland, the Daily Worker thrust a microphone in his
face, and Robeson glowed about the new world he had discovered. The
Daily Worker rushed its Robeson interview into print,
running it in the January 15, 1935 issue under the headline, "'I Am
at Home,' Says Robeson At Reception in Soviet Union."
The Bolsheviks, explained Robeson, were new men, unshackled by
the glories of Stalinism. When he got there, Robeson said he had
not been "prepared for the happiness I see on every face in
Moscow." He had been "aware that there was no starvation" in
Russia, but was bowled over by the "bounding life," "endless
friendliness," and "feeling of safety and abundance and freedom" he
found "wherever I turn."
Paul Robeson had discovered sheer equality under Joseph Stalin.
When asked about Stalin's purges, which the Daily Worker's
faithful comrades characterized as warranted executions of a
"number of counter-revolutionary terrorists," Robeson retorted:
"From what I have already seen of the workings of the Soviet
Government, I can only say that anybody who lifts his hand against
it ought to be shot!"
Paul Robeson was deadly serious. To shoot such malefactors, said
Robeson emphatically, was "the government's duty." How dare anyone
oppose "this really free society" run by Stalin, Vyacheslav
Molotov, Lavrenti Beria, the NKVD, the GRU, and regulated by the
vast Gulag archipelago? Any such villain, by Robeson's estimation,
ought to be "put down… with a firm hand." Robeson hoped that "they
[Soviet authorities] will always do it" -- that is, always employ
such just executions.
Robeson told the Daily Worker that he felt a "kinship"
with the Soviet Union. It was "a home to me." So much so, in fact,
that Robeson moved his family there.
It would take almost a half century more, after Robeson's death,
for Communist Party USA to publicly concede the obvious: Paul
Robeson had been a longtime secret member. In May 1998, the
centennial of Robeson's birth, longtime CPUSA head Gus Hall
finally, proudly revealed the truth.
In this birthday tribute to "Comrade Paul," Hall and CPUSA came
bearing gifts. "We have a birthday present for Paul that no one
else can give," said Hall, "the full truth and nothing but the
truth." And what's that truth? "Paul was a proud member of the
Communist Party USA," stated Hall unequivocally. Paul had been a
man of communist "conviction." This was "an indelible fact of
Paul's life," in "every way, every day of his adult life." He
"never forgot he was a Communist." A teary-eyed Hall recalled that
his "own most precious moments with Paul were when I met with him
to accept his dues and renew his yearly membership in the
CPUSA."
None of this, naturally, is mentioned in The Nation
profile, which blasts anyone who dared consider Robeson a
communist. Such people, of course, are pure retrograde, Neanderthal
McCarthyites.
Instead, The Nation insists that "comrade Paul" was a
"progressive." That is particularly remarkable for another reason:
a frustrated Gus Hall had warned about progressives trying to
portray Robeson as one of their own. A vigilant Hall said that
communists "cannot allow … liberal, progressive" forces "to turn
Robeson into a liberal. The real Robeson was a revolutionary, a
Communist…. Paul Robeson was one of ours -- a Communist leader, a
beloved comrade."
Nonetheless, modern progressives continue to do just that. Such
are the witting depths of their self-delusion. They believe what
they want to believe.
I. F. Stone
And that brings me to I. F. Stone.
Stone is listed at number 26 on The Nation's list.
Likewise, there is no mention of words like "communist" or "Soviet
Union" anywhere in his profile. That's no surprise. Stone has been
hailed by
liberals for decades as the literal "conscience" of journalism.
The Los Angeles Times dubbed him the "conscience of
investigative journalism," and CNN's Larry King called him a
"hero." When Stone died, an Oliphant cartoon showed him outside the
Pearly Gates, with Saint Peter telephoning God, "Yes,
THAT I. F. Stone, Sir. He says he doesn't want to come
in -- he'd rather hang around out here, and keep things
honest."
But we now know that Stone was not always so honest. At one
time, he was a paid Soviet agent. In their latest work, published
by Yale University Press, historians John Earl Haynes, Harvey
Klehr, and Alexander Vassiliev conclude that Stone was a "Soviet
spy." In an article excerpted from the book and published in the
April 2009 online version of Commentary magazine, they
wrote: "To put it plainly, from 1936 to 1939 I. F. Stone was a
Soviet spy." Also closely studying Stone's case is Herb Romerstein,
the authority on the Venona papers. In The Venona Secrets,
Romerstein and co-author Eric Breindel wrote: "it is clear from the
evidence that Stone was indeed a Soviet agent." One of the stronger
confirmations from the Soviet side is retired KGB general Oleg
Kalugin, who stated flatly: "He [Stone] was a KGB agent since 1938.
His code name was 'Blin.' When I resumed relations with him in
1966, it was on Moscow's instructions. Stone was a devoted
Communist." Kalugin added that Stone "changed in the course of time
like many of us"; in other words, he did not remain a communist --
but for a time he was a Soviet agent.
None of this appears at Stone's "progressive" profile at The
Nation.
And speaking of progressives with communist sympathies, also on
The Nation's list is
Margaret Sanger. Like Paul Robeson and numerous other
hope-filled leftists, the Planned Parenthood matron sojourned to
Stalin's Potemkin villages in 1934. "[W]e could well take example
from Russia," advised Sanger upon her return, "where birth control
instruction is part of the regular welfare service of the
government." Sanger enthusiastically reported this in the June 1935
edition of her publication, Birth Control Review.
The Planned Parenthood founder was, however, taken aback by the
explosion in the number of abortions once legalized by the
Bolsheviks. No fear, though. Sanger offered this stunning
prediction: "All the [Bolshevik] officials with whom I discussed
the matter stated that as soon as the economic and social plans of
Soviet Russia are realized, neither abortions nor contraception
will be necessary or desired. A functioning Communistic society
will assure the happiness of every child, and will assume the full
responsibility for its welfare and education."
This was pure progressive utopianism, an absolute faith in
central planners.
Even guiltier of such misguided Soviet infatuation was John
Dewey, founding father of American public education, who was so
suckered by the Soviets that I would need a few thousand words here
just to detail the outrage (click
here and
here for more). Oh, yes, Dewey is also on The Nation's
list of influential progressives -- at number 5.
Overall, the number of socialists, communists, and Soviet
sympathizers on The Nation's list is dizzying: Upton
Sinclair, Henry Wallace, W. E. B. DuBois, Norman Thomas, Lincoln
Steffens, Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger, Tom Hayden, Barbara
Ehrenreich.
Thus, I'm compelled to ask: Is this "progressivism"? Is
progressivism synonymous with liberalism, or is it to the left of
liberalism? Is it socialism? Is it somewhere on the spectrum
between socialism and communism? Does it include liberals,
socialists, and communists?
I ask progressives, I plead with them: This is your ideology,
could you better define it, if that's even possible? Or is the
definition of progressivism always progressing? Actually,
it is always progressing -- which is precisely the problem with
this train-wreck of an ever-elusive ideology.
The Nation's list of leading American "progressives" is
an illuminating insight into the American left and the very essence
of "progressive" thought -- whatever that might be. Take a look at
it, study it, think about it. This is truly a teachable moment.
About the Author
Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City College. His books include The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism and the newly released Dupes: How America's Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a Century. See the new March issue of The American Spectator for his cover story on David Axelrod.
No comments:
Post a Comment